Satellite Affordable Housing Associates v. Joachim
| SATELLITE AFFORDABLE HOUSING ASSOCIATES |
| DUANE JOACHIM |
| 26-2556 |
| April 24, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Civil (Rico) |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 22, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 MANDATE ISSUED Michelle T. FRIEDLAND, Ryan D. NELSON, Bridget S. BADE. The judgment of this Court, entered 5/28/2026, takes effect this date. [Entered: 06/22/2026 10:03 AM] |
Filing 3
ORDER FILED. (Michelle T. FRIEDLAND, Ryan D. NELSON, Bridget S. BADE) An order remanding a removed action to state court for lack of subject matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 1447(c) is not reviewable on appeal or otherwise. See 28 U.S.C. 1447(d); Acad. of Country Music v. Contl Cas. Co., 991 F.3d 1059, 1066 (9th Cir. 2021) (court of appeals may review district courts characterization of remand order only to determine whether courts assertion that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction was colorable); see also Kunzi v. Pan Am. World Airways, Inc., 833 F.2d 1291, 1293 (9th Cir. 1987). This court lacks jurisdiction to review the April 7, 2026 remand order. This appeal is therefore dismissed. See 9th Cir. R. 3-6(b) (if court determines it lacks jurisdiction, court may dismiss appeal without notice or further proceedings). DISMISSED. [Entered: 05/28/2026 09:24 AM]
|
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 7/6/2026, Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 6/3/2026. For appeal no. 26-2556, 4:26-cv-01698-HSG. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 04/24/2026 01:20 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 4:26-cv-01698-HSG has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-2556 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 04/24/2026 01:09 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Satellite Affordable Housing Associates v. Joachim | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: SATELLITE AFFORDABLE HOUSING ASSOCIATES | |
| Represented By: | Mercedes A. Gavin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: DUANE JOACHIM | |
| Represented By: | Duane Joachim |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
