Van Huisen v. Acevedo
| GREGORY SCOTT VAN HUISEN |
| LEANNA LUNDY and RAFAEL ACEVEDO |
| 26-2562 |
| April 24, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 18, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Miscellaneous Relief filed by Petitioner Gregory Scott Van Huisen. [Entered: 06/18/2026 02:10 PM] |
| Filing 5 TERMINATED participation of Respondent Leanna Lundy. [Entered: 06/08/2026 11:36 AM] |
| Filing 4 ADDED Respondent Rafael Acevedo [Entered: 06/08/2026 11:35 AM] |
| Filing 3 SCHEDULE NOTICE. No briefing schedule is set for this type of case. All subsequent correspondence regarding this matter will be added to your file to be considered at the same time the cause is brought before the court. [Entered: 04/24/2026 02:58 PM] |
| Filing 2 CASE OPENED. Your case opening documents have been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 4/24/2026. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-2562 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for assistance. [Entered: 04/24/2026 02:56 PM] |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION for Leave to File 28 U.S.C. 2254 Second or Successive Petition. [Entered: 04/24/2026 02:39 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
