Rico v. Holbrook, et al.
Petitioner: AARON DAVID RICO, III
Respondent: DAVID HOLBROOK, Warden and ROB BONTA
Case Number: 26-2657
Filed: April 28, 2026
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 8, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 8, 2026 Filing 5 CJA Counsel Appointment Counsel for Appellant Benjamin Patrick Ramos Added. [Entered: 06/08/2026 11:28 AM]
May 29, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER FILED. Lisa B. Fitzgerald, Appellate Commissioner. The motion (Docket Entry No. 3) for appointment of counsel is granted. See 18 U.S.C. 3006A. Within 14 days of identifying counsel, the appointing authority for the Southern District of California is requested to send counsels contact information to [email protected]. The opening brief is due August 4, 2026. The answering brief is due September 3, 2026. The optional reply brief is due 21 days after the answering brief is served. The clerk will serve this order on appellant individually. [Entered: 05/29/2026 01:50 PM]
May 20, 2026 Filing 3 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel filed by Appellant Aaron David Rico, III. [Entered: 05/21/2026 09:33 AM]
April 28, 2026 Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 6/8/2026, Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 7/7/2026. For appeal no. 26-2657, 3:22-cv-00701-AGS-LR. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 04/28/2026 04:34 PM]
April 28, 2026 Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 3:22-cv-00701-AGS-LR has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-2657 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 04/28/2026 04:32 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Rico v. Holbrook, et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: AARON DAVID RICO, III
Represented By: Mr. Benjamin Patrick Ramos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: DAVID HOLBROOK, Warden
Represented By: Matthew Mulford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: ROB BONTA
Represented By: Matthew Mulford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?