Franquemont v. Stinnett, et al.
| DREW EDWARD FRANQUEMONT, MAVERICK |
| AMY JANE STINNETT, Driver, CURTIS STINNETT, Owner/Policyholder, STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, COUNTY OF CLARK, a municipal corporation, DOES 1-50, SHELTER MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY and HETAL RETAIL, INC. |
| 26-2693 |
| April 29, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 24, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 MAIL RETURNED. DE 3 addressed to Appellant Drew Edward Franquemont. Action taken: none (appellant has registered for electronic filing). [Entered: 06/24/2026 03:48 PM] |
| Filing 8 CLERK ACTION: Opening Brief submitted at DE 7 by Appellant Drew Edward Franquemont is filed. No paper copies are required. (briefing remains stayed) [Entered: 06/08/2026 09:36 AM] |
| Filing 7 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Drew Edward Franquemont. [Entered: 06/05/2026 09:56 PM] |
| Filing 6 RESPONSE to Order - Order to Show Cause (OSC) (DE 3) filed by Appellant Drew Edward Franquemont. [Entered: 05/26/2026 01:28 PM] |
| Filing 5 MAIL RETURNED. DE 2 addressed to Appellant Drew Edward Franquemont. Action taken: none (appellant registered for electronic filing). [Entered: 05/20/2026 04:21 PM] |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Appellant Drew Edward Franquemont. [Entered: 05/05/2026 10:52 AM] |
Filing 3
ORDER FILED. The district court has certified that this appeal is not taken in good faith and denied appellant leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a). Within 35 days, appellant must: (1) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, OR (2) file a motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). If appellant files a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous, or any other response other than a motion to dismiss, the court will determine whether the appeal is frivolous. If it is frivolous, the appeal will be dismissed. If it is not frivolous, the appeal will proceed. Briefing is stayed. If appellant does not respond to this order, the court may dismiss this appeal without further notice. The clerk will serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward, and (3) a Form 4 financial affidavit. [Entered: 05/01/2026 09:01 AM]
|
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 6/8/2026. For appeal no. 26-2693, 3:26-cv-05051-BHS. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 04/29/2026 04:41 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 3:26-cv-05051-BHS has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-2693 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 04/29/2026 04:34 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.