United States of America v. Mecham
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| LORRIE ELMER MECHAM |
| 26-275 |
| January 14, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 8, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 CLERK ACTION: Opening Brief and Excerpts of Record submitted at DE 5, DE 6 by Appellant Lorrie Elmer Mecham are filed. No paper copies are required. [Entered: 07/08/2026 09:11 AM] |
| Filing 7 Presentence Report UNDER SEAL filed by Appellant Lorrie Elmer Mecham. [Entered: 07/07/2026 12:14 PM] |
| Filing 6 EXCERPTS OF RECORD submitted for filing by Appellant Lorrie Elmer Mecham. [Entered: 07/07/2026 12:13 PM] |
| Filing 5 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Lorrie Elmer Mecham. [Entered: 07/07/2026 12:12 PM] |
| Filing 4 TEXT ORDER FILED. The motion (Docket Entry No. 3) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is due July 7, 2026. The answering brief is due August 6, 2026. The optional reply brief is due 21 days after the answering brief is served. [Entered: 03/18/2026 08:30 AM] |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Extend Time to File Brief filed by Appellant Lorrie Elmer Mecham. [Entered: 03/12/2026 11:40 AM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Sentence Imposed: 3 MONTHS. Appeal Transcript Due (Appellant) 2/27/2026, Appeal Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 4/8/2026, Appeal Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 5/8/2026, Appeal Transcript Order Due (Appellant) 1/28/2026. For appeal no. 26-275, 1:08-cr-00172-DCN-1. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule may result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1 [Entered: 01/14/2026 01:53 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 1:08-cr-00172-DCN-1 has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-275 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 01/14/2026 01:47 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: United States of America v. Mecham | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Ms. Kassandra Jean McGrady |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: LORRIE ELMER MECHAM | |
| Represented By: | Nicole Owens |
| Represented By: | Hannah Grace Pugh |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
