Sivak v. Bastian, et al.
| LACEY SIVAK |
| STANLEY ALLEN BASTIAN, DISTRICT JUDGE, TIMOTHY M. BURGESS, CIRCUIT JUDGE, G. MURRAY SNOW, DISTRICT JUDGE, DOLLY M. GEE, DISTRICT JUDGE, DAVID G. ESTUDILLO, DISTRICT JUDGE, SUSAN P. GRABER, CIRCUIT JUDGE, MORGAN B. CHRISTEN, CIRCUIT JUDGE, JACQUELINE H. NGUYEN, CIRCUIT JUDGE, RYAN D. NELSON, CIRCUIT JUDGE and BRIDGET S. BADE, CIRCUIT JUDGE |
| 26-276 |
| January 14, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Prisoner Petitions-Mandamus/Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 2, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Document received in this closed case after court order stating that no further filings will be entertained. Order and docket sheet sent to filer. [Entered: 02/02/2026 10:21 AM] |
| Filing 4 Document received in this closed case after court order stating that no further filings will be entertained. Order and docket sheet sent to filer. [Entered: 01/28/2026 10:54 AM] |
Filing 3
ORDER FILED. Barry G. SILVERMAN, Richard A. PAEZ, Holly A. THOMAS. This court has reviewed the notices of appeal and the district court records in the actions listed above pursuant to the pre-filing review order entered in appeal No. 23-80069. The appeals lack sufficient merit to proceed. See In re Thomas, 508 F.3d 1225, 1227 (9th Cir. 2007). The appeals are therefore dismissed. This order, served on the district court for the Northern District of California, constitutes the mandate of this court. No further filings will be entertained. DISMISSED. [26-280, 26-282, 26-276] [Entered: 01/26/2026 04:34 PM]
|
| Filing 2 PREFILING REVIEW DOCKETING NOTICE. This case has been opened and assigned the Ninth Circuit case number 26-276. This case is subject to a pre-filing review order entered in case number 23-80069, and will be reviewed by the Court to determine whether it will be permitted to proceed. [Entered: 01/14/2026 02:08 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 3:25-cv-06374-AMO has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-276 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 01/14/2026 02:03 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
