American Taxpayers Fighting Fraud, LLC v. Pape, et al.
Plaintiff: United States of America ex rel. AMERICAN TAXPAYERS FIGHTING FRAUD, LLC
Defendant: JAMES S. PAPE, an individual, JEANNE DIBELLA, an individual and THE ARCTICOM GROUP, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
Case Number: 26-2831
Filed: May 5, 2026
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Qui Tam False Claims Act
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 27, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 27, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 9) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 8/14/2026, Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 7/15/2026. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 05/27/2026 04:15 PM]
May 27, 2026 Filing 9 Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief filed by Appellant American Taxpayers Fighting Fraud, LLC. [Entered: 05/27/2026 10:30 AM]
May 20, 2026 Filing 8 RELEASED FROM MEDIATION (text only). This case is released from the Mediation Program. [Entered: 05/20/2026 08:17 AM]
May 20, 2026 Filing 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Appellant American Taxpayers Fighting Fraud, LLC. [Entered: 05/20/2026 06:23 AM]
May 19, 2026 Filing 6 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Appellee James S. Pape, Appellee Jeanne Dibella, Appellee The Arcticom Group, LLC. [Entered: 05/19/2026 01:01 PM]
May 11, 2026 Filing 5 MEDIATION QUESTIONNAIRE filed by Appellant American Taxpayers Fighting Fraud, LLC. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please email #[email protected] and include the case name and number in the subject line. Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts. [Entered: 05/11/2026 11:16 AM]
May 6, 2026 Filing 4 ADDED Counsel for Appellee Nathan Wilson [Entered: 05/06/2026 09:00 AM]
May 6, 2026 Filing 3 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Nathan Wilson for Appellee James S. Pape, Appellee Jeanne Dibella, Appellee The Arcticom Group, LLC. [Entered: 05/06/2026 07:42 AM]
May 5, 2026 Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 7/15/2026, Mediation Questionnaire due (Appellant) 5/11/2026, Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 6/15/2026. For appeal no. 26-2831, 3:24-cv-01001-RFL. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 05/05/2026 10:11 AM]
May 5, 2026 Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 3:24-cv-01001-RFL has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-2831 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 05/05/2026 10:05 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: American Taxpayers Fighting Fraud, LLC v. Pape, et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States of America ex rel. AMERICAN TAXPAYERS FIGHTING FRAUD, LLC
Represented By: Mr. Charles Dender
Represented By: Ms. Kathryn Lee Boyd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JAMES S. PAPE, an individual
Represented By: Margaret McCall Reece
Represented By: Nathan Wilson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JEANNE DIBELLA, an individual
Represented By: Margaret McCall Reece
Represented By: Nathan Wilson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: THE ARCTICOM GROUP, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
Represented By: Margaret McCall Reece
Represented By: Nathan Wilson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?