Moffatt v. State of Arizona, et al.
Plaintiff: JEFFREY MOFFATT
Defendant: STATE OF ARIZONA, ARIZONA SUPREME COURT, STATE BAR OF ARIZONA and SCOTT BALES, Chief Justice, in his Official Capacity
Case Number: 26-2839
Filed: May 5, 2026
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 12, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 12, 2026 Filing 10 MOTION to Strike Filing or Portion of Filing filed by Appellee State Bar of Arizona. [COURT ENTERED FILING to refile motion filed in DE 9.] [Entered: 06/12/2026 11:08 AM]
June 12, 2026 Filing 9 RESPONSE to Motion to File Document Under Seal and Sealed Document Submitted for Filing (DE 6) filed by Appellee State Bar of Arizona. [COURT UPDATE: Refiled motion in DE 10.] [Entered: 06/12/2026 11:02 AM] [Edited: 06/12/2026 11:08 AM]
June 5, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER FILED. The motions at Docket Entry Nos. 6 and 7 are referred to the panel that decides the merits of this appeal. The motion (Docket Entry No. 5) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is due September 14, 2026. The answering brief is due October 14, 2026. The optional reply brief is due 21 days after the answering brief is served. [Entered: 06/05/2026 01:22 PM]
June 1, 2026 Filing 7 MOTION UNDER SEAL to Supplement or Correct Record filed by Appellant Jeffrey Moffatt. [Entered: 06/02/2026 11:45 AM]
June 1, 2026 Filing 6 MOTION to File Document Under Seal and Sealed Document Submitted for Filing filed by Appellant Jeffrey Moffatt. [Entered: 06/02/2026 11:42 AM]
May 22, 2026 Filing 5 MOTION to Extend Time to File Brief filed by Appellant Jeffrey Moffatt. [Entered: 05/26/2026 02:09 PM]
May 13, 2026 Filing 4 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Appellant Jeffrey Moffatt. [Entered: 05/14/2026 01:18 PM]
May 12, 2026 Filing 3 MEDIATION QUESTIONNAIRE filed by Appellee State Bar of Arizona. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please email #[email protected] and include the case name and number in the subject line. Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts. [Entered: 05/12/2026 12:01 PM]
May 5, 2026 Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 7/14/2026, Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 6/15/2026. For appeal no. 26-2839, 2:17-cv-06029-VBF-DFM. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 05/05/2026 11:32 AM]
May 5, 2026 Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:17-cv-06029-VBF-DFM has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-2839 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 05/05/2026 11:21 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Moffatt v. State of Arizona, et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: STATE OF ARIZONA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ARIZONA SUPREME COURT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: STATE BAR OF ARIZONA
Represented By: Nicholas M. Krebs
Represented By: Mr. Michael Scully
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SCOTT BALES, Chief Justice, in his Official Capacity
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JEFFREY MOFFATT
Represented By: Jeffrey Moffatt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?