Cardiff v. United States District Court for the Central District of California, Riverside
Petitioner: JASON EDWARD THOMAS CARDIFF
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE
Real Party In Interest: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Case Number: 26-2849
Filed: May 5, 2026
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 7, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 7, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER FILED. (Michelle T. FRIEDLAND, Ryan D. NELSON, Bridget S. BADE) Petitioner has not demonstrated a clear and indisputable right to the extraordinary remedy of mandamus. See In re Mersho, 6 F.4th 891, 897 (9th Cir. 2021) (To determine whether a writ of mandamus should be granted, we weigh the five factors outlined in Bauman v. United States District Court.); Bauman v. U.S. Dist. Court, 557 F.2d 650 (9th Cir. 1977). The petition is denied. The request for a stay is denied as moot. DENIED. [Entered: 05/07/2026 09:07 AM]
May 5, 2026 Filing 5 SCHEDULE NOTICE for Petition for a Writ of Mandamus and-or Prohibition. [Entered: 05/05/2026 01:19 PM]
May 5, 2026 Filing 4 CASE OPENED. Your case opening documents have been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 5/5/2026. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-2849 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for assistance. [Entered: 05/05/2026 01:16 PM]
May 5, 2026 Filing 3 EXHIBITS to Petition for a Writ of Mandamus and-or Prohibition filed by Petitioner Jason Edward Thomas Cardiff. [Entered: 05/05/2026 01:12 PM]
May 5, 2026 Filing 2 EXHIBITS to Petition for a Writ of Mandamus and-or Prohibition filed by Petitioner Jason Edward Thomas Cardiff. --[COURT UPDATE: Attached correct PDF of exhibits.] [Entered: 05/05/2026 01:12 PM] [Edited: 05/06/2026 04:08 PM]
May 5, 2026 Filing 1 PETITION for a Writ of Mandamus and/or Prohibition filed by Petitioner Jason Edward Thomas Cardiff. [Entered: 05/05/2026 01:12 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Cardiff v. United States District Court for the Central District of California, Riverside
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: JASON EDWARD THOMAS CARDIFF
Represented By: Stephen R. Cochell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Real party in interest: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Criminal Appeals USAO C.D.C.A., Appellate Criminal Chief
Represented By: Mr. Manu Sebastian
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?