Holmes v. Reusch, et al.
| DAVID HOLMES |
| JASON REUSCH, NLVPD P#2511, LOREN COOLEY, NLVPD P#2147, DOTTY'S CASINO CEO, CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGAS, RICHARD CRAIG ESTEY, Chief Executive Officer of Dotty's Casino, JASON SCARAL, Chief of Security and Surveillance for Dotty's Casino, MARCUS COOK, Officer CHASITY SMITH, Officer WALTER BATARINA, OCTAVIO MURILLO-PINEDO, SPENCER KINNEY, Officer ROBERT SHERBURNE, Officer JORDAN BEINKE, Officer JENNIFER MILLER, Officer DANIEL KRIVAK, Officer WILLIAM BULL, Officer COBY SIMPSON, Officer RUBEN NUNEZ and Officer NICHOLAS HARRIS |
| 26-2852 |
| May 5, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 2, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 MOTION to File Oversized Brief filed by Appellant David Holmes. [Entered: 07/02/2026 01:54 PM] |
| Filing 9 Miscellaneous pro se filings received from Appellant David Holmes. [Entered: 06/26/2026 02:12 PM] |
| Filing 8 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Appellant David Holmes. [Entered: 06/08/2026 03:20 PM] |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel filed by Appellant David Holmes. [Entered: 06/08/2026 02:11 PM] |
| Filing 6 Notice of Withdrawal of Counsel filed at DE 5 is rejected. New counsel must enter an appearance because a corporation cannot appear pro se. [Entered: 05/11/2026 09:56 AM] |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Withdrawal as Counsel filed by Robert R McCoy. Counsel withdrawing on behalf of other attorney(s): No [[-]]. Party proceeding without counsel: No. [-]. [Entered: 05/09/2026 09:37 AM] |
| Filing 4 Notice of Withdrawal of Counsel filed at DE 3 is rejected. New counsel must enter an appearance because a corporation cannot appear pro se. [Entered: 05/06/2026 09:21 AM] |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Withdrawal as Counsel filed by Robert R McCoy. Counsel withdrawing on behalf of other attorney(s): No [[-]]. Party proceeding without counsel: No. [-]. [Entered: 05/06/2026 08:44 AM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Transcript Order Due (Appellant) 5/11/2026, Appeal Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 8/19/2026, Appeal Transcript Due (Appellant) 6/10/2026, Appeal Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 7/20/2026. For appeal no. 26-2852, 2:24-cv-01138-GMN-BNW. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 05/05/2026 01:33 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:24-cv-01138-GMN-BNW has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-2852 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 05/05/2026 01:29 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
