USTelecom - The Broadband Association v. Houck, et al.
| USTELECOM - THE BROADBAND ASSOCIATION |
| DARCIE L. HOUCK, in their official capacities as Commissioners of the California Public Utilities Commission, JOHN REYNOLDS, in their official capacities as Commissioners of the California Public Utilities Commission, KAREN DOUGLAS, in their official capacities as Commissioners of the California Public Utilities Commission, MATTHEW BAKER, in their official capacities as Commissioners of the California Public Utilities Commission and ALICE BUSCHING REYNOLDS, in their official capacities as Commissioners of the California Public Utilities Commission |
| 26-2853 |
| May 5, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 2, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER FILED. The motion (Docket Entry No. 9) to amend the case caption is granted. The clerk will amend the docket to reflect that appellants name is USTelecom The Broadband Association. The clerk will also amend the docket to reflect that defendant Alice Busching Reynolds is not a party to this appeal. The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. [Entered: 06/02/2026 09:43 AM]
|
| Filing 9 MOTION to Amend Case Caption filed by Appellant USTelecom - The Broadband Association. [Entered: 05/20/2026 08:11 AM] |
|
Filing 8
ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 7) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 8/14/2026, Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 7/15/2026. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 05/19/2026 04:07 PM]
|
| Filing 7 Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief filed by Appellant USTelecom - The Broadband Association. [Entered: 05/19/2026 12:13 PM] |
| Filing 6 RELEASED FROM MEDIATION (text only). This case is released from the Mediation Program. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. [Entered: 05/19/2026 11:50 AM] |
| Filing 5 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Appellant USTelecom - The Broadband Association. [Entered: 05/19/2026 09:26 AM] |
| Filing 4 MEDIATION ORDER: By 5/19/2026, counsel to email Circuit Mediator regarding settlement potential. Include Ninth Circuit case name and number in subject line. This communication will be kept confidential, if requested, and should not be filed with the court. The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. [Entered: 05/12/2026 01:28 PM] |
| Filing 3 MEDIATION QUESTIONNAIRE filed by Appellant USTelecom - The Broadband Association. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please email #[email protected] and include the case name and number in the subject line. Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts. [Entered: 05/11/2026 10:57 AM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 7/14/2026, Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 6/15/2026, Mediation Questionnaire due (Appellant) 5/11/2026. For appeal no. 26-2853, 3:25-cv-08959-LB. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 05/05/2026 01:38 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 3:25-cv-08959-LB has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-2853 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 05/05/2026 01:35 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: USTelecom - The Broadband Association v. Houck, et al. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: DARCIE L. HOUCK, in their official capacities as Commissioners of the California Public Utilities Commission | |
| Represented By: | Mrs. Hien Vo Winter |
| Represented By: | Mr. Jonathan Creekmore Koltz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: JOHN REYNOLDS, in their official capacities as Commissioners of the California Public Utilities Commission | |
| Represented By: | Mrs. Hien Vo Winter |
| Represented By: | Mr. Jonathan Creekmore Koltz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: KAREN DOUGLAS, in their official capacities as Commissioners of the California Public Utilities Commission | |
| Represented By: | Mrs. Hien Vo Winter |
| Represented By: | Mr. Jonathan Creekmore Koltz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: MATTHEW BAKER, in their official capacities as Commissioners of the California Public Utilities Commission | |
| Represented By: | Mrs. Hien Vo Winter |
| Represented By: | Mr. Jonathan Creekmore Koltz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: ALICE BUSCHING REYNOLDS, in their official capacities as Commissioners of the California Public Utilities Commission | |
| Represented By: | Mrs. Hien Vo Winter |
| Represented By: | Mr. Jonathan Creekmore Koltz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: USTELECOM - THE BROADBAND ASSOCIATION | |
| Represented By: | Mr. Scott H. Angstreich |
| Represented By: | Barbara Alexandra Jones |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
