Riez v. Turo, Inc.
| KRISZTIAN MARK RIEZ |
| TURO, INC. |
| 26-2961 |
| May 8, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Contract Actions |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 16, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Appellant Krisztian Mark Riez. [Entered: 06/16/2026 10:20 AM] |
| Filing 10 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Appellee Turo, Inc.. [Entered: 06/15/2026 07:12 PM] |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Accept Late Filing filed by Appellee Turo, Inc.. [Entered: 06/15/2026 07:10 PM] |
| Filing 8 ADDED Counsel for Appellee Ilene Pabian [Entered: 06/15/2026 01:53 PM] |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Ilene Pabian for Appellee Turo, Inc.. [Entered: 06/15/2026 01:10 PM] |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Ilene Pabian for Appellee Turo, Inc.. [Entered: 06/15/2026 01:09 PM] |
| Filing 5 CLERK ACTION: Opening Brief submitted at DE 4 by Appellant Krisztian Mark Riez is filed. No paper copies are required. [Entered: 06/15/2026 09:57 AM] |
| Filing 4 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Krisztian Mark Riez.--[Court entered filing to correct DE 3] [Entered: 06/15/2026 09:56 AM] |
| Filing 3 DEFECTIVE --- REPLY BRIEF ON CROSS-APPEAL submitted for filing by Appellant Krisztian Mark Riez.--[Wrong brief type, correct entry is DE 4] [Entered: 06/12/2026 03:11 PM] [Edited: 06/15/2026 09:56 AM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 7/17/2026, Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 6/17/2026. For appeal no. 26-2961, 3:25-cv-06901-AMO. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 05/08/2026 04:22 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 3:25-cv-06901-AMO has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-2961 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 05/08/2026 04:12 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Riez v. Turo, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: KRISZTIAN MARK RIEZ | |
| Represented By: | Mr. Krisztian Mark Riez |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: TURO, INC. | |
| Represented By: | Jacqueline Harvey |
| Represented By: | Ms. Ilene Pabian, AT |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
