Harvey v. United States District Court for the District of Arizona, Phoenix
| STEPHEN CHRISTIAN HARVEY |
| UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA, PHOENIX |
| TOWN OF GILBERT, CITY OF CHANDLER, CITY OF MESA, COUNTY OF MARICOPA, INTOWN SUITES, WATERSIDE AT OCOTILLO, SAHARA & PLAYA PALMS APARTMENTS, CHAMBERLIN & ASSOCIATES, LLC, UNKNOWN PARTY, named as Director of AZ Department of Public Safety, UNKNOWN PARTY, named as Director of AZ Department of Transportation, Officer BRYSON ENGHOLM, Gilbert PD, Officer MATTHEW FIGLEY, Chandler PD, Officer EVA ZERMENO, Chandler PD, Officer K. MEADE, Gilbert PD, Officer M. BADALUCCO, Gilbert PD, Officer UNKNOWN SHEPPARD, Gilbert PD, Officer UNKNOWN FELIX, Gilbert PD, Officer M. STRACKE, Gilbert PD, Officer UNKNOWN CONCHIREZ, Mesa PD, UNKNOWN PARTIES, Unknown Gilbert and Mesa Officers, ACT TOWING, LLC, UNKNOWN PARTY, named as towing operator, JACKSON WHITE, PC, UNKNOWN GORDON, Staff, InTown Suites, UNKNOWN DANIEL, Property Manager, InTown Suites, MONICA NOLAN, Attorney, CARLOS CALLE, Paralegal and UNKNOWN PARTY, April 2nd Liaison |
| 26-2979 |
| May 11, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 29, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 DEFECTIVE --- FEE PAID by Appellant money order number 19-839511606 for $600.00. --[COURT UPDATE: Entered in error.] [Entered: 05/29/2026 02:04 PM] [Edited: 06/01/2026 11:31 AM] |
Filing 4
ORDER FILED. (Michelle T. FRIEDLAND, Ryan D. NELSON, Bridget S. BADE) Petitioner has not demonstrated a clear and indisputable right to the extraordinary remedy of mandamus. See In re Mersho, 6 F.4th 891, 897 (9th Cir. 2021) (To determine whether a writ of mandamus should be granted, we weigh the five factors outlined in Bauman v. United States District Court.); Bauman v. U.S. Dist. Court, 557 F.2d 650 (9th Cir. 1977); see also Demos v. U.S. Dist. Court, 925 F.2d 1160, 1161 (9th Cir. 1991) ([T]his court lacks jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus to a state court.). The petition is denied. No further filings will be entertained in this closed case. DENIED. [Entered: 05/13/2026 08:52 AM]
|
| Filing 3 SCHEDULE NOTICE for Petition for a Writ of Mandamus and-or Prohibition. [Entered: 05/11/2026 11:42 AM] |
| Filing 2 CASE OPENED. Your case opening documents have been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 5/8/2026. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-2979 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for assistance. [Entered: 05/11/2026 11:39 AM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION for a Writ of Mandamus and/or Prohibition filed by Petitioner Stephen Christian Harvey. [Entered: 05/11/2026 11:35 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.