Cohen v. Arizona Board of Regents, et al.
| DAVID COHEN, an individual |
| ARIZONA BOARD OF REGENTS, ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY and RAYMOND ANDERSON, an individual |
| 26-303 |
| January 15, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 13, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
ORDER FILED. This appeal was administratively closed. The appeal is reopened. The briefing schedule previously set by the court is amended as follows: the opening brief is due August 14, 2026; the answering brief is due September 14, 2026; the optional reply brief is due within 21 days from the service date of the answering brief. This case is released from the Mediation Program. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant settlement discussions. All further inquiries regarding this appeal, including requests for extensions of time, should be directed to the Clerks office. [Entered: 07/13/2026 02:22 PM]
|
| Filing 14 MEDIATION SCHEDULED - Video Mediation 7/13/2026, 10:00 am. See order for instructions and details. [Entered: 06/29/2026 09:38 AM] |
| Filing 13 MEDIATION ORDER (text only). The administrative closure period is extended until 6/26/2026. At any time before that date, any party may request that this appeal be reopened. [Entered: 05/28/2026 11:07 AM] |
| Filing 12 MEDIATION SCHEDULED - IN-PERSON Mediation 6/26/2026, 10:00 am. See order for instructions and details. [Entered: 05/15/2026 11:44 AM] |
| Filing 11 MEDIATION ORDER (text only) - The mediation scheduled for 5/15/2026 is canceled and will be reset by further order of the court. [Entered: 05/14/2026 04:51 PM] |
| Filing 10 MEDIATION SCHEDULED - IN-PERSON Mediation 5/15/2026, 10:00 am. See order for instructions and details. [Entered: 04/02/2026 11:32 AM] |
|
Filing 9
ORDER FILED. The Clerk is directed to temporarily close this courts docket for administrative purposes until May 22, 2026. This administrative closure is not a decision on the merits and no mandate will issue in connection with this order. At any time, any party may request that this appeal be reopened. [Entered: 04/02/2026 11:05 AM]
|
| Filing 8 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED (text only) - DIAL-IN Mediation Conference Call 4/2/2026, 10:00 am Pacific Time. Each participant will receive an email with dial-in instructions. [Entered: 03/31/2026 11:11 AM] |
| Filing 7 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED (text only) - DIAL-IN Mediation Conference Call 4/7/2026, 2:30 pm Pacific Time. Each participant will receive an email with dial-in instructions. The briefing schedule is amended as follows: Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 5/6/2026, Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 7/3/2026, Optional Reply Brief (Appellant) due within 21 days from the service date of the answering brief. [Entered: 03/04/2026 06:35 PM] |
| Filing 6 MEDIATION CONFERENCE RESCHEDULED (text only) - DIAL-IN Mediation Conference Call 3/4/2026, 3:00 PM Pacific Time (originally 2/24/2026). Each participant will receive an email modifying the dial-in information. [Entered: 02/23/2026 10:53 AM] |
| Filing 5 MEDIATION CONFERENCE RESCHEDULED (text only) - DIAL-IN Mediation Conference Call 2/24/2026, 1:30 PM Pacific Time (originally 2/24/2026, 2:00 pm). Each participant will receive an email modifying the dial-in information. [Entered: 02/19/2026 02:33 PM] |
| Filing 4 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 2/24/2026, 2:00 p.m. PACIFIC Time. See order for instructions and details. [Entered: 01/21/2026 03:34 PM] |
| Filing 3 MEDIATION QUESTIONNAIRE filed by Appellant David Cohen. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please email #[email protected] and include the case name and number in the subject line. Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts. [Entered: 01/20/2026 03:11 PM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 5/6/2026, Appeal Transcript Due (Appellant) 2/25/2026, Appeal Transcript Order Due (Appellant) 1/26/2026, Appeal Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 4/6/2026, Mediation Questionnaire due (Appellant) 1/20/2026. For appeal no. 26-303, 2:21-cv-01178-GMS. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 01/15/2026 10:27 AM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:21-cv-01178-GMS has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-303 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 01/15/2026 10:24 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
