Friddle v. Thomas, et al.
Plaintiff: DANNY FRIDDLE
Defendant: TODD THOMAS, in their individual and official capacities, JODY BRADLEY, in their individual and official capacities, SHAWN WEAD, in their individual and official capacities, NORMAN CARRIER, in their individual and official capacities, JUAN VALENZUELA, in their individual and official capacities, CARLA ROBERTSON, in their individual and official capacities, J. LONG, in their individual and official capacities, L. JIMENEZ, in their individual and official capacities, S. LOVELACE, in their individual and official capacities, T. HERNANDEZ, in their individual and official capacities, UNKNOWN PARTIES, named as Does 1-4, in their individual and official capacities, UNKNOWN COX, in their individual and official capacities, HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, in their individual and official capacities, LOZA, in their individual and official capacities, UNKNOWN DUNSING, in their individual and official capacities, UNKNOWN GLENN, in their individual and official capacities and CORECIVIC, INC., in their individual and official capacities
Case Number: 26-3046
Filed: May 13, 2026
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 25, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 25, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER FILED. Paper Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 11) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 8/21/2026, Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 9/21/2026. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 06/25/2026 05:16 PM]
June 23, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER FILED. Appellants response to this courts May 15, 2026 order attests that appellant delivered the notice of appeal to prison authorities for forwarding to the district court on April 23, 2026, within 30 days after the district court entered judgment on March 26, 2026. See 28 U.S.C. 2107(a); Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), (c)(1). The May 15, 2026 order is discharged. Appellants motion (Docket Entry Nos. 5, 6) for an extension of time to pay the fees is granted. Within 30 days, appellant must pay $605 to the district court and file proof of payment in this court. If appellant does not do so, the court will dismiss this appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. The pro se opening brief is due July 22, 2026. The answering brief is due August 21, 2026. The optional pro se reply brief is due 21 days after the answering brief is served. Appellant is not required to submit excerpts of record. If appellant does not submit excerpts, appellees must submit all documents cited in the pro se opening brief or otherwise required by the rules. See 9th Cir. R. 30-1. [Entered: 06/23/2026 01:32 PM]
June 18, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER FILED. Paper Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 8) denied as unnecessary. The briefing schedule is stayed. See court order dated 5/15/2026. [Entered: 06/18/2026 05:24 AM]
June 15, 2026 Filing 11 STREAMLINED request for extension of time to file brief for 30 days filed by Appellant Danny Friddle. [Entered: 06/25/2026 05:13 PM]
June 15, 2026 Filing 8 STREAMLINED request for extension of time to file brief for 30 days filed by Appellant Danny Friddle. [Entered: 06/16/2026 04:33 PM]
June 15, 2026 Filing 7 CORRESPONDENCE filed by Appellant Danny Friddle. [Entered: 06/15/2026 03:59 PM]
June 15, 2026 Filing 6 MOTION for Miscellaneous Relief filed by Appellant Danny Friddle. [Entered: 06/15/2026 03:58 PM]
June 15, 2026 Filing 5 MOTION to Accept Late Filing filed by Appellant Danny Friddle. [Entered: 06/15/2026 03:56 PM]
June 8, 2026 Filing 4 Miscellaneous pro se filings received from Appellant Danny Friddle. [Entered: 06/09/2026 12:22 PM]
May 15, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER FILED. Appellants notice of appeal was dated April 20, 2026, and the district court received it on May 4, 2026, more than 30 days after the district court entered judgment on March 26, 2026. See 28 U.S.C 2107(a); Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A). A pro se prisoners notice of appeal is deemed filed when deposited in the institutions internal mail system if appellant submits sufficient evidence. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1); Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 270 (1988). Within 21 days, appellant must file a declaration or notarized statement attesting to the date the notice of appeal was deposited and whether first-class postage was prepaid. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1); Douglas v. Noelle, 567 F.3d 1103 (9th Cir. 2009). If appellant does not do so, the court will dismiss this appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If appellant files a declaration or statement, appellees may file a response within 10 days. Briefing is stayed. The clerk will serve Form 33 Inmate Declaration of Timely Filing on appellant. [Entered: 05/15/2026 10:41 AM]
May 13, 2026 Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 7/22/2026, Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 6/22/2026. For appeal no. 26-3046, 2:23-cv-01072-KML-CDB. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 05/13/2026 11:09 AM]
May 13, 2026 Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:23-cv-01072-KML-CDB has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-3046 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 05/13/2026 10:59 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Friddle v. Thomas, et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DANNY FRIDDLE
Represented By: Danny Friddle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: TODD THOMAS, in their individual and official capacities
Represented By: Rachel Love
Represented By: Daniel Patrick Struck
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JODY BRADLEY, in their individual and official capacities
Represented By: Rachel Love
Represented By: Daniel Patrick Struck
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SHAWN WEAD, in their individual and official capacities
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NORMAN CARRIER, in their individual and official capacities
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JUAN VALENZUELA, in their individual and official capacities
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CARLA ROBERTSON, in their individual and official capacities
Represented By: Rachel Love
Represented By: Daniel Patrick Struck
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: J. LONG, in their individual and official capacities
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: L. JIMENEZ, in their individual and official capacities
Represented By: Rachel Love
Represented By: Daniel Patrick Struck
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: S. LOVELACE, in their individual and official capacities
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: T. HERNANDEZ, in their individual and official capacities
Represented By: Rachel Love
Represented By: Daniel Patrick Struck
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UNKNOWN PARTIES, named as Does 1-4, in their individual and official capacities
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UNKNOWN COX, in their individual and official capacities
Represented By: Rachel Love
Represented By: Daniel Patrick Struck
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, in their individual and official capacities
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: LOZA, in their individual and official capacities
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UNKNOWN DUNSING, in their individual and official capacities
Represented By: Rachel Love
Represented By: Daniel Patrick Struck
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UNKNOWN GLENN, in their individual and official capacities
Represented By: Rachel Love
Represented By: Daniel Patrick Struck
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CORECIVIC, INC., in their individual and official capacities
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?