Aretis Limited v. Oakever Games Pte., Ltd.
| ARETIS LIMITED, doing business as Hungry Studio |
| OAKEVER GAMES PTE., LTD. |
| 26-3176 |
| May 18, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Copyright |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 29, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER FILED. Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties (Docket Entry No. 9), this appeal is voluntarily dismissed. Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). The parties shall bear their own costs and attorneys fees on appeal. A copy of this order shall serve as and for the mandate of this court. [Entered: 06/29/2026 04:47 PM]
|
| Filing 9 MOTION to Voluntarily Dismiss filed by Appellant Oakever Games Pte., Ltd.. [Entered: 06/29/2026 09:58 AM] |
| Filing 8 MEDIATION STATUS REPORT DUE. Mediation Appellant Status Report due (Appellant) 8/10/2026, Mediation Appellee Status Report due (Appellee) 8/10/2026. Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 9/9/2026, Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 10/9/2026. See order for instructions and details. [Entered: 06/11/2026 04:29 PM] |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Transcript Designation filed by Appellant Oakever Games Pte., Ltd.. [Entered: 05/27/2026 11:10 AM] |
| Filing 6 MEDIATION CONFERENCE RESCHEDULED (text only) - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference Call 6/9/2026, 1:00 PM Pacific Time (originally 6/8/2026). Each participant will receive an email with dial-in information. [Entered: 05/27/2026 10:26 AM] |
| Filing 5 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 6/8/2026, 11:00 a.m. PACIFIC Time. See order for instructions and details. [Entered: 05/27/2026 09:52 AM] |
| Filing 4 MEDIATION QUESTIONNAIRE filed by Appellant Oakever Games Pte., Ltd.. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please email #[email protected] and include the case name and number in the subject line. Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts. [Entered: 05/26/2026 08:58 AM] |
| Filing 3 TERMINATED participation of Counsel for Appellee Zheng Liu, representing Appellee Aretis Limited (attorney added to case in error). [Entered: 05/19/2026 08:38 AM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 6/29/2026, Mediation Questionnaire due (Appellant) 5/26/2026, Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 7/27/2026. For appeal no. 26-3176, 4:25-cv-04570-AMO. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 05/18/2026 02:37 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 4:25-cv-04570-AMO has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-3176 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 05/18/2026 02:32 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Aretis Limited v. Oakever Games Pte., Ltd. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: ARETIS LIMITED, doing business as Hungry Studio | |
| Represented By: | Zheng Liu |
| Represented By: | Mark S. Lee |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: OAKEVER GAMES PTE., LTD. | |
| Represented By: | Ian Charles Ballon |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
