Emrit v. Obama, et al.
| RONALD SATISH EMRIT, Presidential Candidate Number P60005535 also known as (aka) Ronald Satish Emrit, & Presidential Committee/Political Action Committee/Separate Segregated Fund (SSF) Number C00569897 and United Emrits of America |
| BARACK OBAMA, Former President, MICHELLE OBAMA, JOSEPH R. BIDEN, Former President, JILL BIDEN, HUNTER BIDEN, KETANJI BROWN-JACKSON, Supreme Court Justice, ANDREW MOUNTBATTEN-WINDSOR, Former Prince and KEIR STARMER, British Prime Minister |
| 26-3236 |
| May 20, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 16, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER FILED. Paper Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 8) denied as unnecessary. This case has been dismissed see court order dated 6/1/2026. [Entered: 06/16/2026 03:09 PM]
|
| Filing 7 Document received in this closed case after court order stating that no further filings will be entertained. Order and docket sheet sent to filer. [Entered: 06/09/2026 10:56 AM] |
| Filing 8 STREAMLINED request for extension of time to file brief for 30 days filed by Appellant Ronald Satish Emrit. [Entered: 06/16/2026 03:06 PM] |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Appellant Ronald Satish Emrit.[No further filings will be entertained.] [Entered: 06/09/2026 10:47 AM] [Edited: 06/09/2026 10:59 AM] |
| Filing 5 CLERK ACTION: Opening Brief submitted at DE 4 by Appellant Ronald Satish Emrit is filed. Original and 0 copies. (case remains closed) [Entered: 06/08/2026 02:51 PM] |
| Filing 4 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Ronald Satish Emrit. [Entered: 06/08/2026 02:49 PM] |
|
Filing 3
ORDER FILED. Michelle T. FRIEDLAND, Ryan D. NELSON, Bridget S. BADE This court has reviewed the May 8, 2026 notice of appeal and the district court record pursuant to the pre-filing review order entered in appeal No. 15-80221. Because this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal, it will not be permitted to proceed. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; see also In re Thomas, 508 F.3d 1225 (9th Cir. 2007). Appeal No. 26-3236 is therefore dismissed. This order, served on the district court for the Western District of Washington, constitutes the mandate of this court. No further filings will be entertained. DISMISSED. --[COURT UPDATE: Updated docket text to add a dash in the case number.] [Entered: 06/01/2026 09:46 AM] [Edited: 06/09/2026 12:06 PM]
|
| Filing 2 PREFILING REVIEW DOCKETING NOTICE. This case has been opened and assigned the Ninth Circuit case number 26-3236. This case is subject to a pre-filing review order entered in case number 15-80221, and will be reviewed by the Court to determine whether it will be permitted to proceed. [Entered: 05/20/2026 10:04 AM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:26-cv-01316-JHC has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-3236 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 05/20/2026 09:35 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
