Pete v. Loeser, et al.
Plaintiff: DAVID R. PETE
Defendant: DEREK LOESER, LESLEY WEAVER, KELLER ROHRBACK, LLP, a limited liability partnership and BLEICHMAR FONTI & AULD, LLP, a limited liability partnership
Case Number: 26-3307
Filed: May 22, 2026
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 2, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 2, 2026 Filing 9 MOTION for Miscellaneous Relief filed by Appellant David R. Pete. [Entered: 07/02/2026 02:28 PM]
July 2, 2026 Filing 8 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Appellant David R. Pete. [Entered: 07/02/2026 02:26 PM]
July 2, 2026 Filing 7 CLERK ACTION: Opening Brief submitted at DE 6 by Appellant David R. Pete is filed. Original and 0 copies. [Entered: 07/02/2026 11:59 AM]
July 1, 2026 Filing 6 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant David R. Pete. [Entered: 07/02/2026 11:57 AM]
June 8, 2026 Filing 5 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Appellee Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, LLP. [Entered: 06/08/2026 05:33 PM]
June 8, 2026 Filing 4 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Appellee Derek Loeser, Appellee Keller Rohrback, LLP. [Entered: 06/08/2026 11:34 AM]
June 5, 2026 Filing 3 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Appellee Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, LLP. [Entered: 06/05/2026 09:27 PM]
May 22, 2026 Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 7/31/2026, Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 7/1/2026. For appeal no. 26-3307, 3:25-cv-10194-VC. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 05/22/2026 10:52 AM]
May 22, 2026 Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 3:25-cv-10194-VC has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-3307 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 05/22/2026 10:33 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Pete v. Loeser, et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DAVID R. PETE
Represented By: David R. Pete
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DEREK LOESER
Represented By: Benjamin Gould
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: LESLEY WEAVER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: KELLER ROHRBACK, LLP, a limited liability partnership
Represented By: Benjamin Gould
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BLEICHMAR FONTI & AULD, LLP, a limited liability partnership
Represented By: Ms. Pamela Blanco Bumatay
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?