Kitilya v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
| RAYMOND JUSTO KITILYA |
| CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION |
| 26-3319 |
| May 22, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 15, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER FILED. Appellant has not filed a declaration or notarized statement attesting to the date the notice of appeal was deposited and whether first-class postage was prepaid, as ordered by this court on June 8, 2026. This appeal is therefore dismissed. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. This order becomes the mandate of the court in 21 days. [Entered: 07/15/2026 04:36 PM]
|
| Filing 6 MAIL RETURNED. DE 3 addressed to Appellant Raymond Justo Kitilya. Action taken: none (inmate is refusing mail; also see DE 4 & 5.) [Entered: 07/01/2026 11:51 AM] |
| Filing 5 MAIL RETURNED. DE 3 addressed to Appellant Raymond Justo Kitilya. Action taken: resending to California Correctional Institution (CCI), P.O. Box 1031, Tehachapi, CA 93581. [Entered: 06/24/2026 12:03 PM] |
| Filing 4 MAIL RETURNED. DE 2 addressed to Appellant Raymond Justo Kitilya. Action taken: resending to California Correctional Institution (CCI), P.O. Box 1031, Tehachapi, CA 93581; along with DE 3. [Entered: 06/15/2026 02:51 PM] |
|
Filing 3
ORDER FILED. Appellants notice of appeal was dated April 11, 2026. This court received it on May 18, 2026 and the district court received it on May 19, 2026, more than 30 days after the district court entered judgment on March 30, 2026. See 28 U.S.C 2107(a); Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), (d). A pro se prisoners notice of appeal is deemed filed when deposited in the institutions internal mail system if appellant submits sufficient evidence. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1); Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 270 (1988). Within 21 days, appellant must file a declaration or notarized statement attesting to the date the notice of appeal was deposited and whether first-class postage was prepaid. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1); Douglas v. Noelle, 567 F.3d 1103 (9th Cir. 2009). If appellant does not do so, the court will dismiss this appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. Briefing is stayed. The clerk will serve Form 33 Inmate Declaration of Timely Filing on appellant. [Entered: 06/08/2026 08:47 AM]
|
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 7/1/2026. For appeal no. 26-3319, 2:25-cv-01348-DC-JDP. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 05/22/2026 01:55 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:25-cv-01348-DC-JDP has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-3319 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 05/22/2026 01:50 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Kitilya v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: RAYMOND JUSTO KITILYA | |
| Represented By: | Raymond Justo Kitilya |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
