Candler v. Morales
| STEVEN R.G. CANDLER |
| RAUL MORALES |
| 26-3389 |
| May 27, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 17, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 SUPPLEMENT to Motion for Appointment of Counsel (DE 7) filed by Appellant Steven R.G. Candler. [Entered: 07/20/2026 02:24 PM] |
| Filing 16 EMERGENCY MOTION for Miscellaneous Relief filed by Appellant Steven R.G. Candler. [Entered: 07/20/2026 02:22 PM] |
Filing 15
ORDER FILED. Sidney R. THOMAS, Kenneth K. LEE The court has considered appellants responses to this courts May 27, 2026, order. The request for a certificate of appealability is denied because the notice of appeal was not timely filed and appellant did not file in the district court, within the jurisdictional time limit, a motion to extend the time for appeal. See 28 U.S.C. 2107, 2253(c)(2); Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5)(A). Any pending motions are denied as moot. DENIED. [Entered: 07/16/2026 03:09 PM]
|
| Filing 14 MOTION for Release from Detention filed by Appellant Steven R.G. Candler. [Entered: 07/16/2026 03:03 PM] |
| Filing 13 MOTION for Miscellaneous Relief filed by Appellant Steven R.G. Candler. [Entered: 07/13/2026 03:13 PM] |
| Filing 12 MOTION to Reconsider Nondispositive Order filed by Appellant Steven R.G. Candler. [Entered: 06/29/2026 12:30 PM] |
|
Filing 11
ORDER FILED. Paper Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 10) denied. It is denied because the briefing schedule is stayed. [Entered: 06/10/2026 03:20 PM]
|
| Filing 10 STREAMLINED request for extension of time to file brief for 30 days filed by Appellant Steven R.G. Candler. [Entered: 06/10/2026 03:11 PM] |
| Filing 9 DOCUMENT SENT. Sent Appellant a copy of the FRAP and Ninth Circuit rules in response to the request filed on 06/09/2026. [Entered: 06/09/2026 02:28 PM] |
| Filing 8 REQUEST for Public Information filed by Appellant Steven R.G. Candler. [Entered: 06/09/2026 02:04 PM] |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel filed by Appellant Steven R.G. Candler. [Entered: 06/09/2026 02:03 PM] |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Miscellaneous Relief filed by Appellant Steven R.G. Candler. [Entered: 06/09/2026 02:01 PM] |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Appellant Steven R.G. Candler. [Entered: 06/09/2026 01:36 PM] |
| Filing 4 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Steven R.G. Candler. [Entered: 06/09/2026 11:44 AM] |
|
Filing 3
ORDER FILED. Appellants notice of appeal is not dated. The district court received it on May 22, 2026, more than 30 days after the district court entered judgment on April 14, 2026. See 28 U.S.C 2107(a); Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A). A pro se prisoners notice of appeal is deemed filed when deposited in the institutions internal mail system if appellant submits sufficient evidence. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1); Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 270 (1988). Within 21 days, appellant must file a declaration or notarized statement attesting to the date the notice of appeal was deposited and whether first-class postage was prepaid. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1); Douglas v. Noelle, 567 F.3d 1103 (9th Cir. 2009). If appellant does not do so, the court will dismiss this request for a certificate of appealability. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If appellant files a declaration or statement, appellee may file a response within 10 days. Briefing is stayed. The clerk will serve Form 33 Inmate Declaration of Timely Filing on appellant. [Entered: 05/27/2026 01:50 PM]
|
| Filing 2 COA SCHEDULE NOTICE. Needs a certificate of appealability. Date COA denied in DC: 4/14/2026. [Entered: 05/27/2026 11:02 AM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 1:25-cv-01346-SAB has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-3389 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 05/27/2026 11:00 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Candler v. Morales | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: STEVEN R.G. CANDLER | |
| Represented By: | Steven R.G. Candler |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: RAUL MORALES | |
| Represented By: | Ms. Tami M. Krenzin |
| Represented By: | Mr. Max Feinstat |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
