Doe Defendants v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California, San Francisco
| DOE DEFENDANTS |
| UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO |
| TED ENTERTAINMENT, INC. |
| 26-3513 |
| June 1, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 29, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 REPLY BRIEF submitted for filing by Petitioner Doe Defendants. [Entered: 07/29/2026 11:56 PM] |
| Filing 16 EXCERPTS OF RECORD submitted for filing by Petitioner Doe Defendants. [Entered: 07/29/2026 10:54 PM] |
| Filing 15 ANSWER to Petition for a Writ of Mandamus and-or Prohibition (DE 1) filed by Real Party in Interest Ted Entertainment, Inc.. [Court entered filing to correct DEs 13 & 14] [Entered: 07/24/2026 09:07 AM] |
| Filing 14 DEFECTIVE---ANSWERING BRIEF submitted for filing by Real Party in Interest Ted Entertainment, Inc.. [Wrong filing type, corrected in DE 15] [Entered: 07/22/2026 08:42 PM] [Edited: 07/24/2026 09:08 AM] |
| Filing 13 DEFECTIVE---EXCERPTS OF RECORD submitted for filing by Real Party in Interest Ted Entertainment, Inc.. [Wrong filing type, corrected in DE 15] [Entered: 07/22/2026 08:40 PM] [Edited: 07/24/2026 09:08 AM] |
| Filing 12 MOTION to Transmit Exhibit filed by Real Party in Interest Ted Entertainment, Inc.. [Entered: 07/21/2026 11:09 AM] |
Filing 11
ORDER FILED. Mary M. SCHROEDER, Morgan B. CHRISTEN, Daniel P. COLLINS Real party in interest must file an answer to this petition for a writ of mandamus within 14 days. See Fed. R. App. P. 21(b). The district court may also address the petition if it so desires. If the district court elects to address the petition, it may file an answer with this court or issue a supplemental order and serve a copy on this court. Petitioners may file a reply within 7 days after service of the answer(s). The clerk will send a copy of this order to the district court and Magistrate Judge Kim. [Entered: 07/08/2026 02:36 PM]
|
| Filing 10 CITATION of Supplemental Authorities (28j Letter) filed by Petitioner Doe Defendants. [Entered: 07/01/2026 04:03 PM] |
| Filing 9 ADDED Counsel for Petitioner Jeffrey Michael Rosenfeld [Entered: 06/22/2026 02:10 PM] |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Jeffrey Michael Rosenfeld for Petitioner Doe Defendants. [Entered: 06/22/2026 01:26 PM] |
| Filing 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Real Party in Interest Ted Entertainment, Inc.. [Entered: 06/15/2026 03:03 PM] |
| Filing 6 CORRESPONDENCE filed by Petitioner Doe Defendants. [Court entered filing to correct DE 5] [Entered: 06/04/2026 03:28 PM] |
| Filing 5 DEFECTIVE---STATUS REPORT filed by Petitioner Doe Defendants. [Wrong filing type, corrected in DE 6] [Entered: 06/04/2026 03:09 PM] [Edited: 06/04/2026 03:29 PM] |
| Filing 4 SCHEDULE NOTICE for Petition for a Writ of Mandamus and-or Prohibition. [Entered: 06/01/2026 02:10 PM] |
| Filing 3 CASE OPENED. Your case opening documents have been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 5/29/2026. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-3513 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for assistance. [Entered: 06/01/2026 02:08 PM] |
| Filing 2 EXHIBITS to Petition for a Writ of Mandamus and-or Prohibition filed by Petitioner Doe Defendants. [Entered: 06/01/2026 02:06 PM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION for a Writ of Mandamus and/or Prohibition filed by Petitioner Doe Defendants. [Entered: 06/01/2026 02:06 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Doe Defendants v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California, San Francisco | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: DOE DEFENDANTS | |
| Represented By: | Mr. Karl S. Kronenberger |
| Represented By: | Leah Rosa Vulic |
| Represented By: | Mr. Jeffrey Michael Rosenfeld |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Real party in interest: TED ENTERTAINMENT, INC. | |
| Represented By: | Rom Aric Bar-Nissim |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
