Doe v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California, San Francisco
| JOHN DOE |
| UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO |
| UNITED STATES OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD ASSOCIATION, UCSF MEDICAL CENTER, ALAMEDA HEALTH SYSTEM, SUTTER EDEN MEDICAL CENTER, VERONICA PERAZA, Dr. YOUSSEF E. YOUSSEF, SARA DULL, REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA and ROYAL AMBULANCE, INC. |
| 26-3515 |
| June 1, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 16, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
ORDER FILED. SILVERMAN, CLIFTON, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges. Petitioner has not demonstrated a clear and indisputable right to the extraordinary remedy of mandamus. See In re Mersho, 6 F.4th 891, 897 (9th Cir. 2021) (To determine whether a writ of mandamus should be granted, we weigh the five factors outlined in Bauman v. United States District Court.); Bauman v. U.S. Dist. Court, 557 F.2d 650 (9th Cir. 1977). The petition is denied. All pending motions are denied as moot. DENIED. [Entered: 07/16/2026 11:58 AM]
|
| Filing 14 MOTION to Stay Lower Court or Agency Proceedings/Order/Judgment filed by Petitioner John Doe. [Entered: 07/15/2026 09:46 PM] |
| Filing 13 Emergency MOTION Circuit Rule 27-3 Certificate filed by Petitioner John Doe.--[COURT UPDATE: Attached PDF of certificate as of 7/16/2026, REPLACING original attachment] [Entered: 07/15/2026 04:20 PM] [Edited: 07/16/2026 09:27 AM] |
|
Filing 12
ORDER FILED. SILVERMAN, WARDLAW, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges. The motion (Docket Entry No. 11) for recusal and reassignment is granted. Judge Wardlaw disagrees with the reasoning behind the request for her recusal, but does not have any reason to doubt the sincerity of the request. Therefore, in an abundance of caution, she is recusing herself from this case. The June 18, 2026 order denying this mandamus petition is vacated and the case will be reassigned. [Entered: 07/01/2026 03:36 PM]
|
| Filing 11 MOTION for Miscellaneous Relief filed by Petitioner John Doe.--[Court entered filing to correct DE 10] [Entered: 06/25/2026 08:40 AM] |
| Filing 10 Emergency MOTION Circuit Rule 27-3 Certificate filed by Petitioner John Doe. [Entered: 06/24/2026 11:11 PM] |
|
Filing 9
ORDER FILED. (Barry G. SILVERMAN, Kim McLane WARDLAW, Consuelo M. CALLAHAN) Petitioner has not demonstrated a clear and indisputable right to the extraordinary remedy of mandamus. See In re Mersho, 6 F.4th 891, 897 (9th Cir. 2021) (To determine whether a writ of mandamus should be granted, we weigh the five factors outlined in Bauman v. United States District Court.); Bauman v. U.S. Dist. Court, 557 F.2d 650 (9th Cir. 1977). The petition is denied. All pending motions are denied as moot. DENIED. [Entered: 06/18/2026 10:26 AM]
|
| Filing 8 Emergency MOTION Circuit Rule 27-3 Certificate filed by Petitioner John Doe. [Entered: 06/16/2026 08:06 AM] |
| Filing 7 CITATION of Supplemental Authorities (28j Letter) filed by Petitioner John Doe. [Entered: 06/16/2026 07:58 AM] |
| Filing 6 CITATION of Supplemental Authorities (28j Letter) filed by Petitioner John Doe. [Entered: 06/16/2026 07:54 AM] |
| Filing 5 SCHEDULE NOTICE for Petition for a Writ of Mandamus and-or Prohibition. [Entered: 06/01/2026 02:44 PM] |
| Filing 4 CASE OPENED. Your case opening documents have been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 6/1/2026. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-3515 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for assistance. [Entered: 06/01/2026 02:41 PM] |
| Filing 3 Emergency MOTION Circuit Rule 27-3 Certificate filed by Petitioner John Doe. [Entered: 06/01/2026 02:40 PM] |
| Filing 2 EXHIBITS to Petition for a Writ of Mandamus and-or Prohibition filed by Petitioner John Doe. [Entered: 06/01/2026 02:40 PM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION for a Writ of Mandamus and/or Prohibition filed by Petitioner John Doe. [Entered: 06/01/2026 02:40 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
