Van Huisen v. Acevedo
| GREGORY SCOTT VAN HUISEN |
| JAMES HILL and RAFAEL ACEVEDO |
| 26-3549 |
| June 2, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 23, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER FILED. The courts June 23, 2026, order stated: This court will not entertain further filings in these closed cases. The court, therefore, will not take any action on the applicants filing at Docket Entry No. 8. [Entered: 07/23/2026 01:06 PM]
|
| Filing 8 Document received in this closed case after court order stating that no further filings will be entertained. Order and docket sheet sent to filer. [Entered: 07/23/2026 12:16 PM] |
|
Filing 7
ORDER FILED. William C. CANBY, Mark J. BENNETT, Bridget S. BADE The applications for authorization to file a second or successive 28 U.S.C. 2254 habeas corpus petition in the district court, proceeding as Case Nos. 26-2562, 26-3549, and 26-3754, are denied. The applicant has not made a prima facie showing under 28 U.S.C. 2244(b)(2) that: (A) the claim relies on a new rule of constitutional law, made retroactive to cases on collateral review by the Supreme Court, that was previously unavailable; or (B)(i) the factual predicate for the claim could not have been discovered previously through the exercise of due diligence; and (ii) the facts underlying the claim, if proven and viewed in light of the evidence as a whole, would be sufficient to establish by clear and convincing evidence that, but for constitutional error, no reasonable factfinder would have found the applicant guilty of the underlying offense. If the applicant continues to submit meritless applications for authorization to file a second or successive 2254 petition, the court may impose a pre-filing review order or other sanctions. Any pending motions are denied as moot. This court will not entertain further filings in these closed cases. Application Nos. 26-2562, 26-3549, and 26-3754: DENIED. [26-2562, 26-3549, 26-3754] [Entered: 06/23/2026 11:37 AM]
|
| Filing 6 Miscellaneous pro se filings received from Petitioner Gregory Scott Van Huisen. [Entered: 06/22/2026 08:35 PM] |
| Filing 5 TERMINATED participation of Respondent James Hill. [Entered: 06/08/2026 11:40 AM] |
| Filing 4 ADDED Respondent Rafael Acevedo [Entered: 06/08/2026 11:38 AM] |
| Filing 3 SCHEDULE NOTICE. No briefing schedule is set for this type of case. All subsequent correspondence regarding this matter will be added to your file to be considered at the same time the cause is brought before the court. [Entered: 06/02/2026 01:35 PM] |
| Filing 2 CASE OPENED. Your case opening documents have been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 6/2/2026. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-3549 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for assistance. [Entered: 06/02/2026 01:32 PM] |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION for Leave to File 28 U.S.C. 2254 Second or Successive Petition. [Entered: 06/02/2026 01:22 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
