Vashisht-Rota v. Harrisburg University, et al.
Plaintiff: APARNA VASHISHT-ROTA
Defendant: HARRISBURG UNIVERSITY and OTTAWA UNIVERSITY
Case Number: 26-358
Filed: January 16, 2026
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 18, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 18, 2026 Filing 4 MANDATE ISSUED Barry G. SILVERMAN, Richard A. PAEZ, Holly A. THOMAS. The judgment of this Court, entered 1/27/2026, takes effect this date. [Entered: 02/18/2026 08:54 AM]
January 27, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER FILED. (Barry G. SILVERMAN, Richard A. PAEZ, Holly A. THOMAS) This court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the December 16, 2025 order challenged in the notice of appeal is not a final or immediately appealable post-judgment order. See 28 U.S.C. 1291. This appeal is therefore dismissed. See 9th Cir. R. 3-6(b) (if court determines it lacks jurisdiction, court may dismiss appeal without notice or further proceedings). All pending motions are denied as moot. No further filings will be entertained in this case. DISMISSED. [Entered: 01/27/2026 03:37 PM]
January 16, 2026 Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 3/27/2026, Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 2/25/2026. For appeal no. 26-358, 3:20-cv-00967-AGS-KSC. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 01/16/2026 04:04 PM]
January 16, 2026 Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 3:20-cv-00967-AGS-KSC has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-358 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 01/16/2026 03:59 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Vashisht-Rota v. Harrisburg University, et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: APARNA VASHISHT-ROTA
Represented By: Aparna Vashisht-Rota
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: HARRISBURG UNIVERSITY
Represented By: William Ireland
Represented By: Miss Bianca Danielle Falcon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: OTTAWA UNIVERSITY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?