Helmann, et al. v. Palestinian Youth Movement, et al.
Plaintiff: RONEN HELMANN, on behalf of all others similarly situated, and,, JUDIT MAULL and CAMERON HIGBY
Defendant: PALESTINIAN YOUTH MOVEMENT, CODEPINK: WOMEN FOR PEACE, a California entity, COURTNEY LENNA SCHIRF, DOES, 1-100, REMO IBRAHIM, DBA Palestinian Youth Movement, CODEPINK ACTION FUND, a California entity, HONOR THE EARTH, a Minnesota entity and WESPAC FOUNDATION, a New York entity
Case Number: 26-3604
Filed: June 4, 2026
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 6, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 6, 2026 Filing 7 MOTION to Stay Proceedings in this Court filed by Appellant Ronen Helmann. [Court entered filing, PDFs from DE 6] [Entered: 07/07/2026 08:53 AM]
July 6, 2026 Filing 6 RESPONSE to Order - Order to Show Cause (OSC) (DE 4) filed by Appellant Ronen Helmann. [Entered: 07/06/2026 08:02 PM]
June 17, 2026 Filing 5 MEDIATION ORDER (text only). This case is released from the court's mediation program. Counsel may contact the Circuit Mediation Office at [email protected] to discuss services available through the Mediation Program or to request a settlement assessment conference. Information regarding the mediation program may be found at www.ca9.uscourts.gov/mediation. [Entered: 06/17/2026 03:45 PM]
June 15, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER FILED. [W]hen a party that has suffered an adverse partial judgment subsequently dismisses any remaining claims without prejudice, and does so without the approval and meaningful participation of the district court, this court lacks jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 1291. Galaza v. Wolf, 954 F.3d 1267, 1272 (9th Cir. 2020). This court may therefore lack jurisdiction over this appeal. Within 21 days, appellant must either file a motion to voluntarily dismiss this appeal or file a statement explaining why it should not be dismissed. If appellant does not do so, the court will dismiss the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If appellant files a statement, appellees may file a response within 10 days. Briefing is stayed. [Entered: 06/15/2026 01:55 PM]
June 10, 2026 Filing 3 MEDIATION ORDER (text only): Mediation Questionnaire due (Appellant) 6/15/2026. The court of appeals' records do not indicate that appellant has filed a mediation questionnaire in accordance with Cir. R. 3-4. Appellant shall file a Mediation Questionnaire (#form07.pdf (uscourts.gov)) or dismiss the appeal voluntarily. Information about the mediation program may be found on the court's website: #www.ca9.uscourts.gov/mediation. [Entered: 06/10/2026 10:25 AM]
June 4, 2026 Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Transcript Due (Appellant) 7/16/2026, Appeal Transcript Order Due (Appellant) 6/16/2026, Appeal Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 9/24/2026, Appeal Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 8/25/2026, Mediation Questionnaire due (Appellant) 6/9/2026. For appeal no. 26-3604, 2:24-cv-05704-SVW-PVC. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 06/04/2026 10:52 AM]
June 4, 2026 Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:24-cv-05704-SVW-PVC has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-3604 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 06/04/2026 10:50 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Helmann, et al. v. Palestinian Youth Movement, et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: RONEN HELMANN, on behalf of all others similarly situated, and,
Represented By: Mr. Mark Javitch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JUDIT MAULL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CAMERON HIGBY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PALESTINIAN YOUTH MOVEMENT
Represented By: Mr. Thomas Bradford Harvey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CODEPINK: WOMEN FOR PEACE, a California entity
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: COURTNEY LENNA SCHIRF
Represented By: Mr. Thomas Bradford Harvey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DOES, 1-100
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: REMO IBRAHIM, DBA Palestinian Youth Movement
Represented By: Mr. Thomas Bradford Harvey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CODEPINK ACTION FUND, a California entity
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: HONOR THE EARTH, a Minnesota entity
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: WESPAC FOUNDATION, a New York entity
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?