State of Washington v. United States Department of Energy, et al.
Petitioner: STATE OF WASHINGTON
Respondent: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY and CHRIS WRIGHT, Secretary of Energy, United States Department of Energy
Case Number: 26-3772
Filed: June 11, 2026
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 12, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 12, 2026 Filing 6 ADDED Counsel for Respondent Kyle Glynn [Entered: 06/12/2026 09:28 AM]
June 12, 2026 Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Kyle Glynn for Respondent Chris Wright, Respondent United States Department of Energy. [Entered: 06/12/2026 07:28 AM]
June 11, 2026 Filing 4 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Respondent Answering Brief due (Respondent) 9/29/2026, Petitioner Opening Brief due (Petitioner) 8/31/2026, Mediation Questionnaire due (Petitioner) 6/16/2026. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1 [Entered: 06/11/2026 03:13 PM]
June 11, 2026 Filing 3 CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 6/11/2026. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-3772 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 06/11/2026 03:10 PM]
June 11, 2026 Filing 2 PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner State of Washington. [Entered: 06/11/2026 03:09 PM]
June 11, 2026 Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner State of Washington. [Entered: 06/11/2026 03:09 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: State of Washington v. United States Department of Energy, et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: STATE OF WASHINGTON
Represented By: Alexandra Kory
Represented By: Cristina Sepe
Represented By: Ms. Talia Thuet
Represented By: Mr. Christopher Huriaux Reitz
Represented By: Mr. Kelly Thomas Wood
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Represented By: Kyle Glynn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: CHRIS WRIGHT, Secretary of Energy, United States Department of Energy
Represented By: Mr. Sean Edward Martin
Represented By: Kyle Glynn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?