Mahler v. Steady Stream, Inc., et al.
Plaintiff: ROBERT EVANS MAHLER
Defendant: STEADY STREAM, INC., MIZUMI BUFFET, LUCY CHEN and JINDI OU
Case Number: 26-3801
Filed: June 12, 2026
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Americans w/Disabilities Act-Othr
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 12, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 12, 2026 Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Transcript Due (Appellant) 7/24/2026, Appeal Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 9/2/2026, Appeal Transcript Order Due (Appellant) 6/24/2026, Appeal Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 10/2/2026, Mediation Questionnaire due (Appellant) 6/17/2026. For appeal no. 26-3801, 3:23-cv-01833-AN. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 06/12/2026 12:37 PM]
June 12, 2026 Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 3:23-cv-01833-AN has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-3801 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 06/12/2026 12:32 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Mahler v. Steady Stream, Inc., et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ROBERT EVANS MAHLER
Represented By: Mr. Leonard Randolph Berman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: STEADY STREAM, INC.
Represented By: Geordie Lance Duckler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MIZUMI BUFFET
Represented By: Geordie Lance Duckler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: LUCY CHEN
Represented By: Geordie Lance Duckler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JINDI OU
Represented By: Geordie Lance Duckler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?