Rasheed v. United States Government, et al.
| TAHEE A. RASHEED and James E. Smith |
| UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, Agent, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, Agent, NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, Bank Manager, DUANE WACHTOLBORN, CITY OF SAN MATEO, COUNTY OF SAN MATEO, SAN MATEO POLICE DEPARTMENT, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CITY OF ALAMEDA, COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, HEALTHRIGHT 360, The Hacker, EXXONMOBIL OIL CORPORATION, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, CAPITAL ONE BANK USA INC., JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., WILSON MEANY, LENNAR CORPORATION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 26-3866 |
| June 16, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Freedom of Information Act of 1974 |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 29, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 MOTION for Miscellaneous Relief filed by Appellant Tahee A. Rasheed. [Entered: 07/29/2026 12:03 PM] |
| Filing 13 Miscellaneous pro se filings received from Appellant Tahee A. Rasheed. [Entered: 07/27/2026 03:36 PM] |
| Filing 12 MOTION to Withdraw Party Filing filed by Appellant Tahee A. Rasheed. [Entered: 07/16/2026 12:26 PM] |
| Filing 11 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Appellant Tahee A. Rasheed. [Entered: 07/13/2026 04:00 PM] |
| Filing 10 MOTION for Injunctive Relief filed by Appellant Tahee A. Rasheed. [Entered: 07/13/2026 03:57 PM] |
| Filing 9 CLERK ACTION: Opening Brief submitted at DE 8 by Appellant Tahee A. Rasheed is filed. Original and 0 copies. (briefing remains stayed, motion for counsel pending) [Entered: 07/13/2026 12:29 PM] |
| Filing 8 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Tahee A. Rasheed. [Entered: 07/13/2026 12:28 PM] |
| Filing 7 Miscellaneous pro se filings received from Appellant Tahee A. Rasheed. [Entered: 07/09/2026 04:07 PM] |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel filed by Appellant Tahee A. Rasheed. [Entered: 07/09/2026 03:55 PM] |
Filing 5
ORDER FILED. Paper Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 4) denied as unnecessary. It is unnecessary because briefing is stayed until resolution of appellant's motion (DE 3) for Appointment of Counsel. See 9th Cir. R. 27-11. [Entered: 07/07/2026 01:46 PM]
|
| Filing 4 STREAMLINED request for extension of time to file brief for 30 days filed by Appellant Tahee A. Rasheed. [Entered: 07/07/2026 01:42 PM] |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel filed by Appellant Tahee A. Rasheed. [Entered: 07/06/2026 11:18 AM] |
| Filing 2 PREFILING REVIEW DOCKETING NOTICE. This case has been opened and assigned the Ninth Circuit case number 26-3866. This case is subject to a pre-filing review order entered in case number 08-80075, and will be reviewed by the Court to determine whether it will be permitted to proceed. [Entered: 06/16/2026 10:06 AM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 3:25-cv-04096-EMC has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-3866 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 06/16/2026 09:58 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
