Immigration Center for Women and Children, et al. v. Noem, et al.
| IMMIGRATION CENTER FOR WOMEN AND CHILDREN, LUPE A., CAMILA B., PAULO C., KENIA J. MERLOS, LUNA E., CARMEN F., YESSENIA RUANO, DANIEL H., COALITION FOR HUMANE IMMIGRANT RIGHTS, LA RAZA CENTRO LEGAL and CALIFORNIA COLLABORATIVE FOR IMMIGRANT JUSTICE |
| KRISTI NOEM, Secretary of Homeland Security, in her official capacity, UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT and UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES |
| 26-3961 |
| June 22, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Statutes - APA Review/Appeal |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 24, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 TEXT ORDER FILED. The motion (Docket Entry No. 5) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is due September 18, 2026. The answering brief is due October 16, 2026. The optional reply brief is due 21 days after the answering brief is served. [Entered: 07/24/2026 03:03 PM] |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Extend Time to File Brief filed by Appellant Kristi Noem, Appellant United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Appellant United States Citizenship and Immigration Services. [Entered: 07/13/2026 06:50 PM] |
| Filing 4 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Appellant Kristi Noem, Appellant United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Appellant United States Citizenship and Immigration Services. [Entered: 07/01/2026 04:52 PM] |
| Filing 3 MEDIATION QUESTIONNAIRE filed by Appellant Kristi Noem, Appellant United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Appellant United States Citizenship and Immigration Services. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please email #[email protected] and include the case name and number in the subject line. Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts. [Entered: 06/29/2026 02:40 PM] |
| Filing 2 PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION SCHEDULE NOTICE. Preliminary Injunction Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 8/17/2026, Preliminary Injunction Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 7/20/2026, Mediation Questionnaire due (Appellant) 6/29/2026. For appeal no. 26-3961, 2:25-cv-09848-AB-AS.All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 06/22/2026 11:07 AM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:25-cv-09848-AB-AS has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-3961 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 06/22/2026 11:05 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
