Fullybright v. United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, Seattle
Petitioner: RUDOLF DOHOUNGBE FULLYBRIGHT
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON, SEATTLE
Real Party In Interest: AMAZON.COM, INC., BLURB, INC. and INGRAM CONTENT GROUP, LLC
Case Number: 26-3963
Filed: June 22, 2026
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 14, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 14, 2026 Filing 20 PETITION FOR PANEL REHEARING and PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC filed by Petitioner Rudolf Dohoungbe Fullybright. [no action necessary, no further filings order entered] [Entered: 08/14/2026 09:14 AM] [Edited: 08/14/2026 09:45 AM]
August 3, 2026 Filing 19 PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC filed by Petitioner Rudolf Dohoungbe Fullybright. [no action necessary, no further filings order entered [Entered: 08/03/2026 09:56 AM] [Edited: 08/03/2026 10:13 AM]
July 31, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER FILED. (Richard C. TALLMAN, Morgan B. CHRISTEN, Daniel P. COLLINS) Petitioner has not demonstrated a clear and indisputable right to the extraordinary remedy of mandamus. See In re Mersho, 6 F.4th 891, 897 (9th Cir. 2021) (To determine whether a writ of mandamus should be granted, we weigh the five factors outlined in Bauman v. United States District Court.); Bauman v. U.S. Dist. Court, 557 F.2d 650 (9th Cir. 1977). The petition is denied. All pending motions are denied as moot. This court will not entertain further filings in this closed case. DENIED. [Entered: 07/31/2026 11:58 AM]
July 24, 2026 Filing 17 SUPPLEMENTAL PETITION for a Writ of Mandamus and/or Prohibition filed by Petitioner Rudolf Dohoungbe Fullybright. [Entered: 07/24/2026 09:24 AM]
July 23, 2026 Filing 16 SUPPLEMENTAL PETITION for a Writ of Mandamus and/or Prohibition filed by Petitioner Rudolf Dohoungbe Fullybright. [Entered: 07/23/2026 06:41 AM]
July 17, 2026 Filing 15 SUPPLEMENTAL PETITION for a Writ of Mandamus and/or Prohibition filed by Petitioner Rudolf Dohoungbe Fullybright. [Entered: 07/17/2026 02:31 AM]
July 3, 2026 Filing 14 SUPPLEMENTAL PETITION for a Writ of Mandamus and/or Prohibition filed by Petitioner Rudolf Dohoungbe Fullybright. [Entered: 07/03/2026 09:57 AM]
June 24, 2026 Filing 13 SUPPLEMENTAL PETITION for a Writ of Mandamus and/or Prohibition filed by Petitioner Rudolf Dohoungbe Fullybright. [Entered: 06/24/2026 02:47 AM]
June 23, 2026 Filing 12 MOTION to Accept Oversized Document Other than a Brief filed by Petitioner Rudolf Dohoungbe Fullybright. [Entered: 06/23/2026 10:07 AM]
June 22, 2026 Filing 11 MOTION for Miscellaneous Relief filed by Petitioner Rudolf Dohoungbe Fullybright. [Court entered filing to correct DE 10] [Entered: 06/22/2026 04:14 PM]
June 22, 2026 Filing 10 DEFECTIVE---MOTION for Injunctive Relief filed by Petitioner Rudolf Dohoungbe Fullybright. [Wrong filing type, corrected in DE 11] [Entered: 06/22/2026 04:10 PM] [Edited: 06/22/2026 04:14 PM]
June 22, 2026 Filing 9 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Petitioner Rudolf Dohoungbe Fullybright. [Entered: 06/22/2026 03:21 PM]
June 22, 2026 Filing 8 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Petitioner Rudolf Dohoungbe Fullybright. [Entered: 06/22/2026 03:12 PM]
June 22, 2026 Filing 7 SCHEDULE NOTICE for Petition for a Writ of Mandamus and-or Prohibition. [Entered: 06/22/2026 12:01 PM]
June 22, 2026 Filing 6 CASE OPENED. Your case opening documents have been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 6/22/2026. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-3963 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for assistance. [Entered: 06/22/2026 11:59 AM]
June 22, 2026 Filing 5 EXHIBITS to Petition for a Writ of Mandamus and-or Prohibition filed by Petitioner Rudolf Dohoungbe Fullybright. [Entered: 06/22/2026 11:58 AM]
June 22, 2026 Filing 4 EXHIBITS to Petition for a Writ of Mandamus and-or Prohibition filed by Petitioner Rudolf Dohoungbe Fullybright. [Entered: 06/22/2026 11:58 AM]
June 22, 2026 Filing 3 EXHIBITS to Petition for a Writ of Mandamus and-or Prohibition filed by Petitioner Rudolf Dohoungbe Fullybright. [Entered: 06/22/2026 11:58 AM]
June 22, 2026 Filing 2 EXHIBITS to Petition for a Writ of Mandamus and-or Prohibition filed by Petitioner Rudolf Dohoungbe Fullybright. [Entered: 06/22/2026 11:58 AM]
June 22, 2026 Filing 1 PETITION for a Writ of Mandamus and/or Prohibition filed by Petitioner Rudolf Dohoungbe Fullybright. [Entered: 06/22/2026 11:58 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Fullybright v. United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, Seattle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: RUDOLF DOHOUNGBE FULLYBRIGHT
Represented By: Rudolf Dohoungbe Fullybright
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON, SEATTLE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Real party in interest: AMAZON.COM, INC.
Represented By: Shontee Pant
Represented By: Rachel Hill Herd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Real party in interest: BLURB, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Real party in interest: INGRAM CONTENT GROUP, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?