Montelongo v. Weiland, et al.
| VICTOR MONTELONGO |
| JAMES WEILAND, WILLIAM GITTERE, CURTIS RIGNEY, CHRISTOPHER COULSTON and EDWARD ELMORE |
| 26-3975 |
| June 22, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 12, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED (text only) - DIAL-IN Mediation Conference Call 8/24/2026, 11:00 am Pacific Time. Each participant will receive an email with dial-in instructions. [Entered: 08/12/2026 05:23 PM] |
| Filing 8 ADDED Counsel for Appellee Samuel Weiss [Entered: 07/29/2026 01:03 PM] |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Samuel Weiss for Appellee Victor Montelongo. [Entered: 07/29/2026 12:12 PM] |
| Filing 6 Miscellaneous pro se filings received from Appellee Victor Montelongo. [Entered: 07/17/2026 01:15 PM] |
| Filing 5 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 8/4/2026, 11:00 a.m. PACIFIC Time. See order for instructions and details. [Entered: 07/14/2026 09:48 AM] |
| Filing 4 MEDIATION QUESTIONNAIRE filed by Appellant James Weiland. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please email #[email protected] and include the case name and number in the subject line. Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts. [Entered: 07/06/2026 05:14 PM] |
| Filing 3 MEDIATION ORDER (text only): Mediation Questionnaire due (Appellant) 7/6/2026. The court of appeals' records do not indicate that appellant has filed a mediation questionnaire in accordance with Cir. R. 3-4. Appellant shall file a Mediation Questionnaire (#form07.pdf (uscourts.gov)) or dismiss the appeal voluntarily. Information about the mediation program may be found on the court's website: #www.ca9.uscourts.gov/mediation. [Entered: 07/01/2026 10:19 AM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 10/13/2026, Appeal Transcript Order Due (Appellant) 7/2/2026, Appeal Transcript Due (Appellant) 8/3/2026, Mediation Questionnaire due (Appellant) 6/29/2026, Appeal Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 9/10/2026. For appeal no. 26-3975, 3:23-cv-00624-CSD. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 06/22/2026 04:49 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 3:23-cv-00624-CSD has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-3975 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 06/22/2026 04:43 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
