Postma, et al. v. Comstock, et al.

Postma, et al. v. Comstock, et al.

Plaintiff:	JULIE POSTMA and KATHLEEN DEMARIA, a married couple
Defendant:	JIM OWEN, a married couple
:	CAROLYNN COMSTOCK
Appellee:	SHARON L. GLEASON, CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE, Judge, United States District Court for the District of Alaska, BRANDON S. LONG, DISTRICT JUDGE, Judge, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, WILLIAM C. GRIESBACH, SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin, KATHERINE MARIE MENENDEZ, DISTRICT JUDGE, Judge, States District Court for the District of Minnesota, JOHN F. DOCHERTY, MAGISTRATE JUDGE, Magistrate Judge, United States District Court for the District of Minnesota and LYLE W. CAYCE, Clerk of Court, United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Case Number:	26-4061
Filed:	June 25, 2026
Court:	U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit:	Other Civil Rights

RSS Track this Docket

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 25, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed	Document Text
June 25, 2026	Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 9/3/2026, Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 8/4/2026. For appeal no. 26-4061, 2:26-cv-01957-LK. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 06/25/2026 02:27 PM]
June 25, 2026	Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:26-cv-01957-LK has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-4061 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 06/25/2026 02:08 PM]

Date Filed

Document Text

June 25, 2026

Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 9/3/2026, Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 8/4/2026. For appeal no. 26-4061, 2:26-cv-01957-LK. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 06/25/2026 02:27 PM]

June 25, 2026

Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:26-cv-01957-LK has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-4061 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 06/25/2026 02:08 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Postma, et al. v. Comstock, et al.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: JULIE POSTMA
Represented By:	Martin Burns
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: KATHLEEN DEMARIA, a married couple
Represented By:	Martin Burns
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: JIM OWEN, a married couple
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Represented By:	Carolynn Comstock
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Appellee: SHARON L. GLEASON, CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE, Judge, United States District Court for the District of Alaska
Represented By:	Mr. Brian Kipnis
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Appellee: BRANDON S. LONG, DISTRICT JUDGE, Judge, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana
Represented By:	Mr. Brian Kipnis
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Appellee: WILLIAM C. GRIESBACH, SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin
Represented By:	Mr. Brian Kipnis
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Appellee: KATHERINE MARIE MENENDEZ, DISTRICT JUDGE, Judge, States District Court for the District of Minnesota
Represented By:	Mr. Brian Kipnis
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Appellee: JOHN F. DOCHERTY, MAGISTRATE JUDGE, Magistrate Judge, United States District Court for the District of Minnesota
Represented By:	Mr. Brian Kipnis
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Appellee: LYLE W. CAYCE, Clerk of Court, United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Represented By:	Mr. Brian Kipnis
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?