Gilmore v. County of Benton
Plaintiff: HUBERT GILMORE
Defendant: COUNTY OF BENTON, a Washington political entity
Case Number: 26-4223
Filed: July 2, 2026
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Americans w/Disabilities Act-Empl
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 24, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 24, 2026 Filing 14 RELEASED FROM MEDIATION (text only). This case is released from the Mediation Program. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant settlement discussions. All further inquiries regarding this appeal, including requests for extensions of time, should be directed to the Clerks office. [Entered: 08/24/2026 11:41 AM]
August 10, 2026 Filing 13 MEDIATION SCHEDULED - Video Mediation 8/17/2026, 10:00 am. See order for instructions and details. [Entered: 08/10/2026 11:16 AM]
August 6, 2026 Filing 12 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED (text only) - DIAL-IN Mediation Conference Call 8/10/2026, 10:30 am Pacific Time. Each participant will receive an email with dial-in instructions. [Entered: 08/06/2026 11:57 AM]
July 27, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 10) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 10/13/2026, Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 9/10/2026. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 07/27/2026 01:52 PM]
July 27, 2026 Filing 10 Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief filed by Appellant Hubert Gilmore. [Entered: 07/27/2026 11:44 AM]
July 27, 2026 Filing 9 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED (text only) - DIAL-IN Mediation Conference Call 8/6/2026, 11:00 am Pacific Time. Each participant will receive an email with dial-in instructions. [Entered: 07/27/2026 11:21 AM]
July 23, 2026 Filing 8 ADDED Counsel for Appellant William J. Schroeder [Entered: 07/23/2026 02:16 PM]
July 23, 2026 Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by William J. Schroeder for Appellant Hubert Gilmore. [Entered: 07/23/2026 02:02 PM]
July 9, 2026 Filing 6 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 7/27/2026, 11:00 a.m. PACIFIC Time. See order for instructions and details. [Entered: 07/09/2026 01:40 PM]
July 7, 2026 Filing 5 MEDIATION QUESTIONNAIRE filed by Appellant Hubert Gilmore. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please email #[email protected] and include the case name and number in the subject line. Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts. [Entered: 07/07/2026 10:47 AM]
July 7, 2026 Filing 4 ADDED Counsel for Appellant Anne Schroeder [Entered: 07/07/2026 09:34 AM]
July 7, 2026 Filing 3 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Anne Schroeder for Appellant Hubert Gilmore. [Entered: 07/07/2026 09:20 AM]
July 2, 2026 Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 9/10/2026, Mediation Questionnaire due (Appellant) 7/7/2026, Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 8/11/2026. For appeal no. 26-4223, 4:25-cv-05011-MKD. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 07/02/2026 11:51 AM]
July 2, 2026 Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 4:25-cv-05011-MKD has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-4223 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 07/02/2026 11:49 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Gilmore v. County of Benton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: HUBERT GILMORE
Represented By: Mr. William Christopher Schroeder
Represented By: Mr. William J. Schroeder
Represented By: Ms. Anne Schroeder
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: COUNTY OF BENTON, a Washington political entity
Represented By: Ms. Amber Dawn Smith
Represented By: Kristofer Bundy
Represented By: Elena Christian Bundy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?