Homan, et al. v. County of Riverside
Plaintiff: NICHOLAS HOMAN, individually and on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, EDUARDO CERVANTES, RYAN GRIGGS, MOISES URIBE and JU EUN PARK
Defendant: COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
Case Number: 26-4232
Filed: July 2, 2026
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 20, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 20, 2026 Filing 8 RELEASED FROM MEDIATION (text only). This case is released from the Mediation Program. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. The conference previously scheduled for August 27, 2026, is canceled. [Entered: 08/20/2026 09:12 AM]
July 23, 2026 Filing 7 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED (text only) - DIAL-IN Mediation Conference Call 8/27/2026, 10:00 am Pacific Time. Each participant will receive an email with dial-in instructions. The briefing schedule is amended as follows: Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 9/28/2026, Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 10/28/2026, Optional Reply Brief (Appellant) due within 21 days from the service date of the answering brief. [Entered: 07/23/2026 12:41 PM]
July 10, 2026 Filing 6 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 7/23/2026, 10:00 AM PACIFIC Time. See order for instructions and details. [Entered: 07/10/2026 05:25 PM]
July 7, 2026 Filing 5 MEDIATION QUESTIONNAIRE filed by Appellant Nicholas Homan. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please email #[email protected] and include the case name and number in the subject line. Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts. [Entered: 07/07/2026 02:18 PM]
July 7, 2026 Filing 4 ADDED Counsel for Appellant Rene M. Maldonado [Entered: 07/07/2026 02:12 PM]
July 7, 2026 Filing 3 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Rene M. Maldonado for Appellant Nicholas Homan. [Entered: 07/07/2026 01:11 PM]
July 2, 2026 Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 9/10/2026, Mediation Questionnaire due (Appellant) 7/7/2026, Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 8/11/2026. For appeal no. 26-4232, 5:23-cv-02516-JGB-SP. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 07/02/2026 02:35 PM]
July 2, 2026 Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 5:23-cv-02516-JGB-SP has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-4232 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 07/02/2026 02:31 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Homan, et al. v. County of Riverside
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: NICHOLAS HOMAN, individually and on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Represented By: Mr. Omid Nosrati
Represented By: Mr. Rene M. Maldonado
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: EDUARDO CERVANTES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: RYAN GRIGGS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: MOISES URIBE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JU EUN PARK
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
Represented By: Mr. Danny Young-In Yoo
Represented By: Victor D. Gonzalez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?