Pineda v. United States District Court for the Central District of California, Los Angeles
| ANTHONY PINEDA, an individual and on behalf of all others similarly situated |
| UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES |
| LTIMINDTREE LIMITED, an India stock corporation, LARSEN & TOUBRO INFOTECH LIMITED, an India stock corporation, PEOPLE FUNCTION, LLC, a New York limited liablity company, HEMANT RAGHAV, an individual and DOES, 1 through 100, inclusive |
| 26-4362 |
| July 9, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 10, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Petitioner Anthony Pineda. [Entered: 07/10/2026 10:27 AM] |
| Filing 4 SCHEDULE NOTICE for Petition for a Writ of Mandamus and-or Prohibition. [Entered: 07/09/2026 11:47 AM] |
| Filing 3 CASE OPENED. Your case opening documents have been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 7/8/2026. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-4362 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for assistance. [Entered: 07/09/2026 11:40 AM] |
| Filing 2 EXHIBITS to Petition for a Writ of Mandamus and-or Prohibition filed by Petitioner Anthony Pineda. [Entered: 07/09/2026 11:31 AM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION for a Writ of Mandamus and/or Prohibition filed by Petitioner Anthony Pineda. [Entered: 07/09/2026 11:31 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Pineda v. United States District Court for the Central District of California, Los Angeles | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: ANTHONY PINEDA, an individual and on behalf of all others similarly situated | |
| Represented By: | Sara Maxine Banco |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Real party in interest: LTIMINDTREE LIMITED, an India stock corporation | |
| Represented By: | Michelle Marie LaMar |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Real party in interest: LARSEN & TOUBRO INFOTECH LIMITED, an India stock corporation | |
| Represented By: | Michelle Marie LaMar |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Real party in interest: PEOPLE FUNCTION, LLC, a New York limited liablity company | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Real party in interest: HEMANT RAGHAV, an individual | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Real party in interest: DOES, 1 through 100, inclusive | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
