Young v. Lang, et al.
| RICKY ANTHONY YOUNG |
| TIMOTHY LANG, Secretary, Washington State Department of Corrections, JAMES KEY, Deputy Assistant Secretary, Dept of Corrections, CAROL SMITH, Resolution Program Manager, Dept of Corrections Resolution Program, JASON RICHER, Resolution Specialist, Dept of Corrections Resolution Program, JEFFEREY PERKINS, Superintendent, Coyote Ridge Corrections Center, CS2 MAINE, Resolution Specialist, Coyote Ridge Corrections Center, CS2 DEAN, Resolution Specialist, Coyote Ridge Corrections Center, CS2 MULLEN, Resolution Specialist, Coyote Ridge Corrections Center, JOHN DOES 1-10, Dept of Correction employees, Dept of Corrections Headquarters, JANE DOES 1-10, Dept of Corrections employees, Dept of Corrections Headquarters and JASON MARTIN, Resolution Specialist, Dept of Corrections Resolution Program |
| 26-4384 |
| July 9, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 1, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 RESPONSE to Motion for Miscellaneous Relief (DE 12) filed by Appellant Ricky Anthony Young. [Entered: 09/01/2026 10:45 AM] |
| Filing 13 CORRESPONDENCE filed by Appellee Timothy Lang. [Court entered filing to correct DE 11] [Entered: 08/25/2026 09:41 AM] |
| Filing 12 MOTION for Miscellaneous Relief filed by Appellee Timothy Lang. [Court entered filing to correct DE 10] [Entered: 08/25/2026 09:39 AM] |
| Filing 11 DEFECTIVE---NOTICE that No Answering Brief Will be Filed filed by Appellee Timothy Lang. [Wrong filing type, corrected in DE 13] [Entered: 08/24/2026 03:17 PM] [Edited: 08/25/2026 09:44 AM] |
| Filing 10 DEFECTIVE---MOTION to Reset Briefing Schedule filed by Appellee Timothy Lang. [Wrong filing type, corrected in DE 12] [Entered: 08/24/2026 03:14 PM] [Edited: 08/25/2026 09:40 AM] |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Appellant Ricky Anthony Young. [Entered: 08/19/2026 02:07 PM] |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel filed by Appellant Ricky Anthony Young. [Entered: 08/19/2026 02:06 PM] |
| Filing 7 RESPONSE to Order - Order to Show Cause (OSC) (DE 6) filed by Appellant Ricky Anthony Young. [Entered: 08/19/2026 02:05 PM] |
Filing 6
ORDER FILED. Appellants motion (Docket Entry No. 4) for reconsideration of the July 10, 2026 clerk order is granted. The July 10, 2026 order (Docket Entry No. 3) is vacated. The district court docket reflects that appellant paid the fee for the district court action. The fees for this appeal are due. Within 21 days, appellant must pay $605 to the district court and file proof of payment in this court or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. If appellant does not do so, the court will dismiss this appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. The district courts June 16, 2026 order certified that any appeal would not be taken in good faith under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) (An appeal may not be taken in forma pauperis if the trial court certifies in writing that it is not taken in good faith.). If appellant elects to file a motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, within 35 days appellant must also file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous. If appellant files a statement that the appeal should go forward, appellees may file a response within 10 days after service of appellants statement. Briefing is stayed. The clerk will serve Form 4 on appellant and a form statement that the appeal should go forward. [Entered: 07/28/2026 04:51 PM]
|
| Filing 5 Miscellaneous pro se filings received from Appellant Ricky Anthony Young. [Entered: 07/23/2026 02:40 PM] |
| Filing 4 Miscellaneous pro se filings received from Appellant Ricky Anthony Young. [Entered: 07/20/2026 03:48 PM] |
|
Filing 3
ORDER FILED. The district courts June 16, 2026 order certified that this appeal is not taken in good faith and revoked appellants in forma pauperis status. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a). Within 35 days, appellant must: (1) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, OR (2) file a motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). If appellant files a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous, or any other response other than a motion to dismiss, the court will determine whether the appeal is frivolous. If it is frivolous, the appeal will be dismissed. If it is not frivolous, the appeal will proceed. If the court dismisses the appeal as frivolous, this appeal may be counted as a strike under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). If appellant files a statement that the appeal should go forward, appellees may file a response within 10 days after service of appellants statement. Briefing is stayed. If appellant does not respond to this order, the court may dismiss this appeal without further notice. The clerk will serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward, and (3) a Form 4 financial affidavit. [Entered: 07/10/2026 02:02 PM]
|
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 9/17/2026, Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 8/18/2026. For appeal no. 26-4384, 4:25-cv-05157-EFS. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 07/09/2026 04:15 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 4:25-cv-05157-EFS has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-4384 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 07/09/2026 04:13 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Young v. Lang, et al. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: RICKY ANTHONY YOUNG | |
| Represented By: | Ricky Anthony Young |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: TIMOTHY LANG, Secretary, Washington State Department of Corrections | |
| Represented By: | Aaron Williams |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: JAMES KEY, Deputy Assistant Secretary, Dept of Corrections | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: CAROL SMITH, Resolution Program Manager, Dept of Corrections Resolution Program | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: JASON RICHER, Resolution Specialist, Dept of Corrections Resolution Program | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: JEFFEREY PERKINS, Superintendent, Coyote Ridge Corrections Center | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: CS2 MAINE, Resolution Specialist, Coyote Ridge Corrections Center | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: CS2 DEAN, Resolution Specialist, Coyote Ridge Corrections Center | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: CS2 MULLEN, Resolution Specialist, Coyote Ridge Corrections Center | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: JOHN DOES 1-10, Dept of Correction employees, Dept of Corrections Headquarters | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: JANE DOES 1-10, Dept of Corrections employees, Dept of Corrections Headquarters | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: JASON MARTIN, Resolution Specialist, Dept of Corrections Resolution Program | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
