Elias v. Bondi, et al.
| RAMON ESTRADA ELIAS |
| PAMELA BONDI, ATTORNEY GENERAL, KRISTI NOEM, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, STEVE ANDERSON, Sheriff, Jefferson County, JASON KNIGHT, Field Office Director of Enforcement and Removal Operations, Salt Lake City Field Office, Immigration and Customs Enforcement and KENNETH PORTER, Acting Director of the Boise U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Field Sub-Office |
| 26-441 |
| January 21, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus (Alien Detainees) |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 1, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 SUPPLEMENT to Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss (DE 5) filed by Appellant Pamela Bondi, Appellant Kristi Noem, Appellant Jason Knight, Appellant Kenneth Porter. [Entered: 04/01/2026 10:58 AM] |
Filing 6
ORDER FILED. The unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. 5) for voluntary dismissal is granted. See Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). This case is dismissed. This order serves as the mandate of the court. [Entered: 03/30/2026 10:19 AM]
|
| Filing 5 MOTION to Voluntarily Dismiss filed by Appellant Pamela Bondi, Appellant Kristi Noem, Appellant Jason Knight, Appellant Kenneth Porter. [Entered: 03/24/2026 07:26 AM] |
|
Filing 4
ORDER FILED. The unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. 3) to stay appellate proceedings is granted. Within 7 days after resolution of Rodriguez Vazquez v. Bostock, et al., No. 25-6842, appellants must file a status report and/or motion for appropriate relief. [Entered: 02/05/2026 03:21 PM]
|
| Filing 3 MOTION to Stay Proceedings in this Court filed by Appellant Pamela Bondi, Appellant Kristi Noem, Appellant Jason Knight, Appellant Kenneth Porter. [Entered: 01/26/2026 07:57 AM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 4/1/2026, Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 3/2/2026. For appeal no. 26-441, 1:25-cv-00594-BLW. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 01/21/2026 03:58 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 1:25-cv-00594-BLW has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-441 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 01/21/2026 03:54 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Elias v. Bondi, et al. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: RAMON ESTRADA ELIAS | |
| Represented By: | Mr. Jacob Cameron Rourk |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: PAMELA BONDI, ATTORNEY GENERAL | |
| Represented By: | Christine Gealy England |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: KRISTI NOEM, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security | |
| Represented By: | Christine Gealy England |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: STEVE ANDERSON, Sheriff, Jefferson County | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: JASON KNIGHT, Field Office Director of Enforcement and Removal Operations, Salt Lake City Field Office, Immigration and Customs Enforcement | |
| Represented By: | Christine Gealy England |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: KENNETH PORTER, Acting Director of the Boise U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Field Sub-Office | |
| Represented By: | Christine Gealy England |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
