Wexler v. City of San Diego, et al.
| MARSHALL A. WEXLER |
| CITY OF SAN DIEGO, SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT, Officer MADISON, Badge #1546, Officer ANDREW SCHEIDECKER, Badge #6827, Officer HIBBARD, Badge #1540, Officer RAYAS, Badge #1680, Officer BRANDON INZUNZA, Badge #1515, UNKNOWN PARTIES, all of the San Diego Police Department, other Unknown Officers, Sergeants, Lieutenants, Captains and other Supervising Officers of the San Diego Police Department, Deputy Chief of Police and Chief of Police, DAVID NISLEIT, Chief of Police, PAUL CONNELLY, Department of Operations Executive Assistant Chief, TINA WILLIAMS, Patrol Operations Assistant Chief, BENJERWIN MANASALA, Northern Patrol Captain, UNKNOWN PARTIES 2, unknown Officers Detectives Sergeants Lieutenants and Captains were Police Officers of the San Diego Police Department, WESTON DANIEL FISK, as owner and operator of DUP-A Key Inc., ROUGH RIDER REAL ESTATE, INC., DBA Wiese & Associates, ERIK WIESE, as owner and operator of Rough Rider Real Estate, Inc., DUP-A-KEY, INC., TONI DOE, County of San Diego, California, SUMMER STEPHAN, District Attorney for the County of San Diego, UNKNOWN PARTIES 3, Two Unnamed Bureau of Investigation Officers For the County of San Diego, California, CHRISTOPHER TIVANIS, Police Officer, JONATHAN WIESE, Police Officer, VINCENT FISK, as owner and operator of DUP-A Key Inc., UNKNOWN PARTIES 4, Unknown Officers, Sergeants, Lieutenants, Captains, Commanders and other Supervising Officers of the San Diego Police Department, UNKNOWN PARTY, Assistant Chief of Police, TODD GLORIA, Mayor of San Diego and CHLOE MADISON, Chief of Public Affairs |
| 26-4482 |
| July 14, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 14, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 8/24/2026, Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 9/22/2026. For appeal no. 26-4482, 3:24-cv-00137-JES-DDL. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 07/14/2026 04:46 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 3:24-cv-00137-JES-DDL has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-4482 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 07/14/2026 04:45 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
