Murray v. King County Superior Court, et al.
| SARA MURRAY, as guardian on behalf of minor G.E.M. minor C.M.M. |
| KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, HOLLOWAY, Judge, King County Court, SEAN O'DONNELL, Judge, King County Court, WHEDBEE, MARTIN, King County Court, EAGLE, Commissioner, King County Court, FURMAN, Commissioner, King County Court, RONDA BILEY, ADA Office, King County Court, SEATTLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, VERNON, Officer, Seattle Police Department, MELANIE ENGLISH, Doctor, Parenting Evaluator, SOUND FAMILY LAW, PLLC, STACIE NACZELNIK, Attorney, Guardian ad Litem (GAL), BAILEY WALTON, Sound Family Law, AT INDABA, WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN YOUTH AND FAMILIES, Board of Psychology, KELSEY MARSH, Department of Children, Youth, and Families, AMBER ALEXANDER, Department of Children, Youth, and Families, BRANDY GANZ, Department of Children, Youth, and Families, CELESTINE LANIER-MCCLARY, Department of Children, Youth, and Families, DAVID STARKS, McKinley Irvin Attorney, LIZ HOFFMAN, McKinley Irvin Attorney, TIMOTHEA HANRATTY, McKinley Irvin Attorney, LINDSEY ANDROSKO, McKinley Irvin Attorney, ALEXANDER MURRAY, KRISTIN MANDRINK, ANNA KILLIEN, Alexander Murray's Partner, JOAN MURRAY, Alexander Murray's Mother, GRIFFIN DEEBACH, STATE BAR OF WASHINGTON, WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, MCKINLEY IRVIN LAW FIRM, RODRIGO LOPES, JODI JOHNSON, Coverage Bailiff of Department 3, King County Court, WASHINGTON COMMISSION FOR JUDICIAL CONDUCT, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, MICHELLE DELLINO, VERONICA FRIETAS, MONICA CARY, VOGLIO DIGITAL MARKETING, DELLINO FAMILY LAW GROUP, STATE OF WASHINGTON and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON |
| 26-454 |
| January 22, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Americans w/Disabilities Act-Othr |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 25, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 42 MOTION for Miscellaneous Relief filed by Appellant Sara Murray. [Court entered filing, PDFs from DE 41] [Entered: 06/25/2026 03:56 PM] |
| Filing 41 MOTION to Accept Oversized Document Other than a Brief filed by Appellant Sara Murray. [Entered: 06/25/2026 02:18 PM] |
| Filing 40 Miscellaneous pro se filings received from Appellant Sara Murray. [Court entered filing to correct DEs 38 & 39] [Entered: 06/12/2026 11:00 AM] |
| Filing 39 DEFECTIVE---STATUS REPORT filed by Appellant Sara Murray. [Wrong filing type, corrected in DE 40] [Entered: 06/12/2026 10:38 AM] [Edited: 06/12/2026 11:02 AM] |
| Filing 38 DEFECTIVE---STATUS REPORT filed by Appellant Sara Murray. [Wrong filing type, corrected in DE 40] [Entered: 06/12/2026 10:26 AM] [Edited: 06/12/2026 11:02 AM] |
| Filing 37 Miscellaneous pro se filings received from Appellant Sara Murray. [Court entered filing to correct DE 36] [Entered: 06/05/2026 03:36 PM] |
| Filing 36 DEFECTIVE---STATUS REPORT filed by Appellant Sara Murray. [Wrong filing type, corrected in DE 37] [Entered: 06/05/2026 03:24 PM] [Edited: 06/05/2026 03:37 PM] |
| Filing 35 Miscellaneous pro se filings received from Appellant Sara Murray. [Court entered filing to correct DE 34] [Entered: 06/05/2026 12:29 PM] |
| Filing 34 DEFECTIVE---STATUS REPORT filed by Appellant Sara Murray. [Wrong filing type, corrected in DE 35] [Entered: 06/05/2026 12:07 PM] [Edited: 06/05/2026 12:29 PM] |
| Filing 33 Miscellaneous pro se filings received from Appellant Sara Murray. [Court entered filing to correct DE 32] [Entered: 06/01/2026 07:56 PM] |
| Filing 32 DEFECTIVE---STATUS REPORT filed by Appellant Sara Murray. [Wrong filing type, corrected in DE 33] [Entered: 05/30/2026 04:34 PM] [Edited: 06/01/2026 07:57 PM] |
| Filing 31 RESPONSE to Motion to Supplement or Correct Record (DE 29) filed by Appellant Sara Murray. [Entered: 05/19/2026 02:11 PM] |
| Filing 30 CLERK ACTION: Answering Brief and Excerpts of Record submitted at DE 25, DE 26 by Appellees Attorney General of the State of Washington, et al. are filed. No paper copies are required. [Entered: 05/19/2026 01:25 PM] |
| Filing 29 MOTION to Supplement or Correct Record filed by Appellee Washington State Department of Children Youth and Families, Appellee Washington Department of Health, Appellee Washington Commission for Judicial Conduct, Appellee State of Washington, Appellee Attorney General of the State of Washington. [Entered: 05/19/2026 12:53 PM] |
| Filing 28 JOINDER TO BRIEF filed by Appellee State Bar of Washington, joining Answering Brief at DE 25 filed by Appellee Washington State Department of Children Youth and Families, Appellee Washington Department of Health, Appellee Washington Commission for Judicial Conduct, Appellee State of Washington, Appellee Attorney General of the State of Washington.--[court entered filing to correct DE 27] [Entered: 05/18/2026 10:18 AM] |
| Filing 27 DEFECTIVE --- ANSWERING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellee State Bar of Washington.--[incorrect entry, correct entry at DE 28] [Entered: 05/15/2026 04:56 PM] [Edited: 05/18/2026 10:19 AM] |
| Filing 26 EXCERPTS OF RECORD submitted for filing by Appellee Washington State Department of Children Youth and Families, Appellee Washington Department of Health, Appellee Washington Commission for Judicial Conduct, Appellee State of Washington, Appellee Attorney General of the State of Washington. [Entered: 05/15/2026 12:21 PM] |
| Filing 25 ANSWERING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellee Washington State Department of Children Youth and Families, Appellee Washington Department of Health, Appellee Washington Commission for Judicial Conduct, Appellee State of Washington, Appellee Attorney General of the State of Washington.--[COURT UPDATE: Corrected PDF attached as of 5/19/2026, REPLACING original attachment] [Entered: 05/15/2026 12:14 PM] [Edited: 05/19/2026 01:20 PM] |
Filing 24
ORDER FILED. treamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 23) denied as unnecessary. The briefing schedule is stayed. See 9th Circuit Rule 27-11. [Entered: 05/08/2026 03:59 PM]
|
| Filing 23 Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief filed by Appellee King County Superior Court, Appellee Holloway, Appellee Sean O'Donnell, Appellee Whedbee, Appellee Martin, Appellee Eagle, Appellee Furman, Appellee Ronda Biley, Appellee Monica Cary. [Entered: 05/08/2026 02:59 PM] |
| Filing 22 MOTION for Miscellaneous Relief filed by Appellant Sara Murray. [Court entered filing, PDFs from DE 21] [Entered: 04/21/2026 09:02 AM] |
| Filing 21 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel filed by Appellant Sara Murray. [Entered: 04/20/2026 05:37 PM] |
| Filing 20 MOTION for Judicial Notice filed by Appellant Sara Murray. [Entered: 03/19/2026 11:45 AM] |
| Filing 19 CLERK ACTION: Opening Brief and Excerpts of Record submitted at DE 16, DE 18 by Appellant Sara Murray are filed. No paper copies are required. [Entered: 03/04/2026 01:11 PM] |
|
Filing 17
ORDER FILED. Barry G. SILVERMAN, Jacqueline H. NGUYEN The motion (Docket Entry No. 6) for appointment of pro bono counsel is denied. The motion (Docket Entry No. 7) to disqualify the Ninth Circuit and transfer the case to an impartial forum is denied. The motion (Docket Entry No. 8) to docket motions to recall the mandate in appellants closed appeals is denied. The request (included in Docket Entry No. 12) to strike the appearance of counsel Jerry L. Taylor and for clarification is denied. The motion (Docket Entry No. 15) to stay the briefing schedule is denied. No motions to reconsider, clarify, or modify this order will be entertained. The opening brief is due April 15, 2026. The answering brief is due May 15, 2026. The optional reply brief is due 21 days after the answering brief is served. Appellant is not required to submit excerpts of record. If appellant does not submit excerpts, appellees must submit all documents cited in the pro se opening brief or otherwise required by the rules. See 9th Cir. R. 30-1. All parties on a side are encouraged to join in a single brief to the extent practicable. See 9th Cir. R. 32-2 Cir. Advisory Comm. Note. [Entered: 03/03/2026 03:43 PM]
|
| Filing 18 EXCERPTS OF RECORD submitted for filing by Appellant Sara Murray.--[court entered filing to correct DE 16] [Entered: 03/04/2026 01:09 PM] |
| Filing 16 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Sara Murray.--[COURT UPDATE: removed PDF of excerpts, re-entered correctly in DE 17] [Entered: 03/02/2026 03:01 PM] [Edited: 03/04/2026 01:10 PM] |
| Filing 15 MOTION to Stay Proceedings in this Court filed by Appellant Sara Murray. [Entered: 02/17/2026 03:51 PM] |
| Filing 14 CORRESPONDENCE filed by Appellant Sara Murray. [Court entered filing to correct DE 13] [Entered: 02/17/2026 03:37 PM] |
| Filing 13 DEFECTIVE---MOTION for Judicial Notice filed by Appellant Sara Murray. [Wrong filing type, corrected in DE 14] [Entered: 02/17/2026 03:25 PM] [Edited: 02/17/2026 03:37 PM] |
| Filing 12 CORRESPONDENCE filed by Appellant Sara Murray. [Court entered filing to correct DE 11] [Entered: 02/05/2026 09:39 AM] |
| Filing 11 DEFECTIVE---STATUS REPORT filed by Appellant Sara Murray. [Wrong filing type, corrected in DE 12] [Entered: 02/04/2026 06:01 PM] [Edited: 02/05/2026 09:40 AM] |
| Filing 10 ADDED Counsel for Appellee Jerry L. Taylor [Entered: 02/04/2026 04:53 PM] |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Jerry L. Taylor for Appellee Eagle, Appellee Furman, Appellee Holloway, Appellee King County Superior Court, Appellee Martin, Appellee Monica Cary, Appellee Ronda Biley, Appellee Sean O'Donnell, Appellee Whedbee. [Entered: 02/04/2026 03:24 PM] |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Recall Mandate filed by Appellant Sara Murray. [Entered: 02/03/2026 02:01 PM] |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Transfer Case to Other Court filed by Appellant Sara Murray. [Entered: 02/03/2026 01:43 PM] |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel filed by Appellant Sara Murray. [Entered: 02/03/2026 01:21 PM] |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Brandon Slaven for Appellee Attorney General of the State of Washington, Appellee State of Washington, Appellee Washington Commission for Judicial Conduct, Appellee Washington Department of Health, Appellee Washington State Department of Children Youth and Families. [Entered: 02/03/2026 01:10 PM] |
| Filing 4 ADDED Counsel for Appellee Isabella M. Foxen [Entered: 01/28/2026 02:25 PM] |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Isabella M. Foxen for Appellee David Starks, Appellee Lindsey Androsko, Appellee Liz Hoffman, Appellee McKinley Irvin Law Firm, Appellee Timothea Hanratty. [Entered: 01/28/2026 01:55 PM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 4/2/2026, Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 3/3/2026. For appeal no. 26-454, 2:24-cv-00239-JNW. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 01/22/2026 12:17 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:24-cv-00239-JNW has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-454 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 01/22/2026 12:12 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
