Mondesir, Sr v. Chambliss
| EDWIGE MONDESIR, SR, by and through next friend Edwige Mondesir Jr. |
| JEFF CHAMBLISS, in his individual capacity and in his official capacity |
| 26-458 |
| January 22, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 23, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Miscellaneous pro se filings received from Appellant Edwige Mondesir, Sr. [Entered: 04/24/2026 11:49 AM] |
| Filing 10 RESPONSE to Order - Order to Show Cause (OSC) (DE 6) filed by Appellant Edwige Mondesir, Sr. [Entered: 03/20/2026 02:15 PM] |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Appellant Edwige Mondesir, Sr. [Entered: 03/10/2026 11:43 AM] |
| Filing 8 CLERK ACTION: Opening Brief submitted at DE 7 by Appellant Edwige Mondesir, Sr is filed. No paper copies are required. [Entered: 03/03/2026 09:46 AM] |
| Filing 7 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Edwige Mondesir, Sr. [Entered: 03/03/2026 09:46 AM] |
Filing 6
ORDER FILED. It appears that appellant Edwige Mondesir, Sr., did not personally sign the notice of appeal, or the motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed in this court. See Fed. R. App. P. 3(c)(2) (notice of appeal considered filed on behalf of the signer); McKinney v. Debord, 507 F.2d 501 (9th Cir. 1974) (pro se appellant must personally sign notice of appeal); see also Becker v. Montgomery, 532 U.S. 757, 765 (2001) (pro se litigants failure to sign the notice of appeal is a non-jurisdictional, and therefore, curable defect); see also McShane v. United States, 366 F.2d 286, 288 (9th Cir. 1966) (non-attorney litigants may not represent other individual litigants). Within 21 days, appellant Edwige Mondesir, Sr., must file a personally signed copy of the notice of appeal in the district court. If appellant Edwige Mondesir, Sr., does not do so, the court will dismiss this appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. It appears that this appeal may be frivolous. If the appeal is frivolous, the court will deny permission to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days, appellant Edwige Mondesir, Sr., must: (1) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and a motion to proceed in forma pauperis personally signed by appellant Edwige Mondesir, Sr., OR (2) file a motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). If appellant files a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous, or any other response other than a motion to dismiss, the court will determine whether the appeal is frivolous. If it is frivolous, the appeal will be dismissed. If it is not frivolous, the appeal will proceed. Briefing is stayed. If appellant does not respond to this order, the court may dismiss this appeal without further notice. The clerk will serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward, and (3) a Form 4 financial affidavit. [Entered: 02/26/2026 03:52 PM]
|
| Filing 5 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Appellant Edwige Mondesir, Sr. [Entered: 02/23/2026 08:58 AM] |
| Filing 4 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Appellant Edwige Mondesir, Sr. [Entered: 02/23/2026 08:57 AM] |
| Filing 3 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Appellant Edwige Mondesir, Sr. [Entered: 02/03/2026 08:09 AM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 3/3/2026. For appeal no. 26-458, 2:25-cv-11386-AH-ADS. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 01/22/2026 12:28 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:25-cv-11386-AH-ADS has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-458 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 01/22/2026 12:24 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Mondesir, Sr v. Chambliss | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: EDWIGE MONDESIR, SR, by and through next friend Edwige Mondesir Jr. | |
| Represented By: | Edwige Mondesir, Sr |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: JEFF CHAMBLISS, in his individual capacity and in his official capacity | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
