Donahue v. Staffing Partners, LLC, et al.
| BLEU BLAZE DONAHUE |
| STAFFING PARTNERS, LLC, JESSICA PHIPPS, PATTY EDWARDS, JOE MILES and DOES, 1-#, in personal capacities |
| 26-4600 |
| July 20, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Consumer Credit |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 17, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER FILED. (Andrew D. HURWITZ, Lawrence VANDYKE, Jennifer SUNG) This court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal filed July 13, 2026, which challenges the district court orders entered on May 14, 2026, May 22, 2026, and June 9, 2026. Appellant lacks standing to appeal the May 14, 2026 and June 9, 2026 denials of in forma pauperis status as moot because appellant was not aggrieved by those orders. The district court granted appellant leave to proceed in forma pauperis before the motions were filed. See United States v. Good Samaritan Church, 29 F. 3d 487, 488 (9th Cir. 1994) (only a party aggrieved by a judgment may appeal). The portion of the June 9, 2026 order denying appellants motion to recuse the district judge is not final or immediately appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; United States v. Washington, 573 F.2d 1121, 1122 (9th Cir. 1978) (order denying motion to disqualify judge is not final or appealable). To the extent appellant challenges the May 22, 2026 order limiting appellant to one email per day to the district court and the portion of the June 9, 2026 order denying the motion to seal and the motion for injunctive relief, the July 13, 2026 notice of appeal is untimely. See 28 U.S.C. 2107(a). This appeal is therefore dismissed. See 9th Cir. R. 3-6(b) (if court determines it lacks jurisdiction, court may dismiss appeal without notice or further proceedings). This court will not entertain further filings in this case. DISMISSED. [Entered: 09/17/2026 10:55 AM]
|
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 8/31/2026. For appeal no. 26-4600, 6:26-cv-00501-MTK. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 07/20/2026 11:59 AM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 6:26-cv-00501-MTK has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-4600 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 07/20/2026 11:55 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
