Norman v. Blanche, et al.
| GARRED FARRELL NORMAN |
| PAMELA BONDI, ATTORNEY GENERAL, Federal Agent COACH, FBI John Doe, BKA Helicopterman, RICHARD SEEBORG, DISTRICT JUDGE, Governor GAVIN NEWSOM, Attorney General ROB BONTA, JOHN LEVI, Executive Director LEAH T. WILSON, Executive Director STANLEY S. BISSEY, C.E.O. YOLANDA JACKSON, C.E.O. HADASSAH HAYASHI, Executive Director BIANCE SIERRA WOLF, Executive Director TOM ROBERTS, Executive Director JODY LORNS, President CLAIRE MELEHANI, Sued in their official capacities and as individuals and TODD BLANCHE, ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| 26-4780 |
| July 27, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 17, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER FILED. (Andrew D. HURWITZ, Lawrence VANDYKE, Jennifer SUNG) The motion (Docket Entry No. 3) to dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction is granted. See 28 U.S.C. 1291. All other pending motions are denied as moot. DISMISSED. [Entered: 09/17/2026 04:12 PM]
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER FILED. Paper Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 11) denied as unnecessary. It is unnecessary. The briefing schedule is stayed. Briefing shall be reset as necessary pending resolution of the motions to dismiss (DE3) and to appoint counsel (DE9,10). [Entered: 09/03/2026 07:27 AM]
|
| Filing 11 STREAMLINED request for extension of time to file brief for 30 days filed by Appellant Garred Farrell Norman. [Entered: 09/02/2026 03:12 PM] |
| Filing 10 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel filed by Appellant Garred Farrell Norman. [Entered: 08/28/2026 03:29 PM] |
| Filing 9 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel filed by Appellant Garred Farrell Norman. [Entered: 08/27/2026 02:13 PM] |
| Filing 8 AMENDED MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Appellant Garred Farrell Norman. [Entered: 08/27/2026 02:12 PM] |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Appellant Garred Farrell Norman. [Entered: 08/25/2026 03:21 PM] |
| Filing 6 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Appellee Leah T. Wilson. [Entered: 08/24/2026 03:20 PM] |
| Filing 5 TERMINATED participation of Appellee Pamela Bondi. [Entered: 08/24/2026 02:54 PM] |
| Filing 4 ADDED Appellee Todd Blanche [Entered: 08/24/2026 02:52 PM] |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Appellee Leah T. Wilson. [Entered: 08/24/2026 01:56 PM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 10/5/2026, Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 9/8/2026. For appeal no. 26-4780, 4:26-cv-04949-AMO. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 07/27/2026 01:37 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 4:26-cv-04949-AMO has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-4780 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 07/27/2026 01:35 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
