Patel v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California, San Francisco
| JAYANTILAL PATEL |
| UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO |
| APURVA BHUVA, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated,, SUPER MICRO COMPUTER, INC., CHARLES LIANG, DAVID WEIGAND, VALIKHAN KUNAKBAYEV, DAVID TRUONG, BEAU SAVAGE, JA HOUSING, INC., ARKANSAS TEACHER RETIREMENT SYSTEM, MISSISSIPPI PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM, HANDELSBANKEN FONDER AB, STOREBRAND ASSET MANAGEMENT AS, KELLY TRAN, LI QUNNAN, CITY OF HIALEAH EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM and BUNDY CHUNG |
| 26-4794 |
| July 27, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 25, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 19 ANSWER to Petition for a Writ of Mandamus and-or Prohibition (DE 1) filed by Real Party in Interest Mississippi Public Employees' Retirement System, Real Party in Interest Handelsbanken Fonder AB, Real Party in Interest Storebrand Asset Management AS, Real Party in Interest City of Hialeah Employees' Retirement System. [Court entered filing to correct DE 18] [Entered: 09/25/2026 03:58 PM] |
| Filing 18 DEFECTIVE---ANSWERING BRIEF submitted for filing by Real Party in Interest Mississippi Public Employees' Retirement System, Real Party in Interest Handelsbanken Fonder AB, Real Party in Interest Storebrand Asset Management AS. [Wrong filing type, corrected in DE 19] [Entered: 09/25/2026 02:24 PM] [Edited: 09/25/2026 03:59 PM] |
| Filing 17 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Real Party in Interest Storebrand Asset Management AS. [Entered: 09/25/2026 02:20 PM] |
| Filing 16 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Real Party in Interest Mississippi Public Employees' Retirement System. [Entered: 09/25/2026 02:16 PM] |
| Filing 15 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Real Party in Interest Handelsbanken Fonder AB. [Entered: 09/25/2026 02:12 PM] |
| Filing 14 ADDED Counsel for Real Party in Interest James Harrod [Entered: 09/25/2026 01:15 PM] |
| Filing 13 ADDED Counsel for Real Party in Interest Hannah G. Ross [Entered: 09/25/2026 01:13 PM] |
| Filing 12 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by James Harrod for Real Party in Interest City of Hialeah Employees' Retirement System, Real Party in Interest Handelsbanken Fonder AB, Real Party in Interest Mississippi Public Employees' Retirement System, Real Party in Interest Storebrand Asset Management AS. [Entered: 09/25/2026 01:11 PM] |
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Hannah G. Ross for Real Party in Interest City of Hialeah Employees' Retirement System, Real Party in Interest Handelsbanken Fonder AB, Real Party in Interest Mississippi Public Employees' Retirement System, Real Party in Interest Storebrand Asset Management AS. [Entered: 09/25/2026 01:10 PM] |
| Filing 10 RESPONSE to notice of case being considered for oral argument filed by Salvatore Graziano. [Entered: 09/23/2026 10:39 AM] |
| Filing 9 ADDED Counsel for Real Party in Interest Salvatore Graziano [Entered: 09/23/2026 09:58 AM] |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Salvatore Graziano for Real Party in Interest City of Hialeah Employees' Retirement System, Real Party in Interest Handelsbanken Fonder AB, Real Party in Interest Mississippi Public Employees' Retirement System, Real Party in Interest Storebrand Asset Management AS. [Entered: 09/23/2026 09:35 AM] |
| Filing 7 NOTICE: This case is being considered for an upcoming oral argument calendar in Pasadena. Please review the Pasadena sitting dates for January 2027 and the subsequent sitting month in that location at #https://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/cases/calendar. Absent an irreconcilable conflict, the court expects you to appear and argue your case during one of these two months. If you have an irreconcilable conflict on any of the dates, please consult with opposing counsel to propose an alternate date and/or location and file Form 32 (#https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/uploads/forms/form32.pdf) within 3 business days of this notice using the ACMS filing type Response to Case Being Considered for Oral Argument. Please follow the form's instructions (#https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/uploads/forms/form32instructions.pdf) carefully. If the parties wish to discuss settlement before an argument date is set, they should jointly request referral to the mediation unit by filing a motion within 3 business days of this notice, using the filing type: Motion to Refer to Mediation. You will receive notice that your case has been assigned to a calendar approximately 10 weeks before the scheduled oral argument date. [26-4794] [Entered: 09/21/2026 02:26 PM] |
Filing 6
ORDER FILED. Sidney R. THOMAS, Marsha S. BERZON, Danielle J. FORREST Real parties in interest must file an answer to this petition for a writ of mandamus within 14 days. See Fed. R. App. P. 21(b). The district court may also address the petition if it so desires. If the district court elects to address the petition, it may file an answer with this court or issue a supplemental order and serve a copy on this court within 14 days. Petitioner may file a reply within 7 days after service of the answer(s). The clerk will send a copy of this order to the district court and Judge Corley. [Entered: 09/11/2026 03:51 PM]
|
| Filing 5 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Petitioner Jayantilal Patel. [Entered: 08/10/2026 04:42 PM] |
| Filing 4 SCHEDULE NOTICE for Petition for a Writ of Mandamus and-or Prohibition. [Entered: 07/27/2026 04:43 PM] |
| Filing 3 CASE OPENED. Your case opening documents have been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 7/27/2026. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-4794 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for assistance. [Entered: 07/27/2026 04:41 PM] |
| Filing 2 EXHIBITS to Petition for a Writ of Mandamus and-or Prohibition filed by Petitioner Jayantilal Patel. [Entered: 07/27/2026 04:18 PM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION for a Writ of Mandamus and/or Prohibition filed by Petitioner Jayantilal Patel. [Entered: 07/27/2026 04:18 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
