Gayles-Zanders v. United States District Court for the District of Nevada, Las Vegas
| SHIRRON GAYLES-ZANDERS |
| UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA, LAS VEGAS |
| WILLIAM REUBART and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA |
| 26-4860 |
| July 29, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 10, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
ORDER FILED. (Sidney R. THOMAS, Marsha S. BERZON, Danielle J. FORREST) Petitioner has not demonstrated a clear and indisputable right to the extraordinary remedy of mandamus. See In re Mersho, 6 F.4th 891, 897 (9th Cir. 2021) (To determine whether a writ of mandamus should be granted, we weigh the five factors outlined in Bauman v. United States District Court.); Bauman v. U.S. Dist. Court, 557 F.2d 650 (9th Cir. 1977). The petition is denied. All pending motions are denied as moot. This court will not entertain further filings in this closed case. DENIED. [Entered: 09/10/2026 11:08 AM]
|
| Filing 14 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel filed by Petitioner Shirron Gayles-Zanders. [Entered: 08/28/2026 01:49 PM] |
| Filing 13 TERMINATED participation of Counsel for Real Party in Interest Erica Berrett, representing Real Party in Interest Attorney General of the State of Nevada, Real Party in Interest William Reubart. [Entered: 08/25/2026 02:16 PM] |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Withdrawal as Counsel filed by Tonya Henderson. Counsel withdrawing on behalf of other attorney(s): Yes [Erica Berrett]. Party proceeding without counsel: No. [-]. [Entered: 08/25/2026 01:54 PM] |
| Filing 11 Miscellaneous pro se filings received from Petitioner Shirron Gayles-Zanders. [Entered: 08/24/2026 03:18 PM] |
| Filing 10 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Petitioner Shirron Gayles-Zanders. [Entered: 08/04/2026 04:11 PM] |
| Filing 9 CJA FORM 23 FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT filed by Petitioner Shirron Gayles-Zanders. [Entered: 08/04/2026 04:10 PM] |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel filed by Petitioner Shirron Gayles-Zanders. [Entered: 08/04/2026 04:09 PM] |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Miscellaneous Relief filed by Petitioner Shirron Gayles-Zanders. [Entered: 08/04/2026 04:08 PM] |
| Filing 6 Emergency MOTION Circuit Rule 27-3 Certificate filed by Petitioner Shirron Gayles-Zanders. [Entered: 08/04/2026 04:06 PM] |
| Filing 5 ADDED Counsel for Real Party in Interest Erica Berrett [Entered: 07/31/2026 11:44 AM] |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Erica Berrett for Real Party in Interest Attorney General of the State of Nevada, Real Party in Interest William Reubart. [Entered: 07/31/2026 11:34 AM] |
| Filing 3 SCHEDULE NOTICE for Petition for a Writ of Mandamus and-or Prohibition. [Entered: 07/29/2026 03:34 PM] |
| Filing 2 CASE OPENED. Your case opening documents have been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 7/28/2026. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-4860 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for assistance. [Entered: 07/29/2026 03:31 PM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION for a Writ of Mandamus and/or Prohibition filed by Petitioner Shirron Gayles-Zanders. [Entered: 07/29/2026 03:30 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
