Pampena, et al. v. Musk
Plaintiff: GIUSEPPE PAMPENA, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, STEVE GARRETT, NANCY PRICE, JOHN GARRETT, BRIAN BELGRAVE and TWITTER INVESTOR GROUP
Defendant: ELON MUSK
Case Number: 26-4928
Filed: July 31, 2026
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 31, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 31, 2026 Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Transcript Order Due (Appellant) 8/13/2026, Appeal Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 11/23/2026, Appeal Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 10/22/2026, Mediation Questionnaire due (Appellant) 8/5/2026, Appeal Transcript Due (Appellant) 9/14/2026. For appeal no. 26-4928, 3:22-cv-05937-CRB. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 07/31/2026 03:08 PM]
July 31, 2026 Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 3:22-cv-05937-CRB has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-4928 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 07/31/2026 02:57 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Pampena, et al. v. Musk
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: GIUSEPPE PAMPENA, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Represented By: Tyson C. Redenbarger
Represented By: Mr. Mark Cotton Molumphy
Represented By: Joseph W. Cotchett
Represented By: Gia Jung
Represented By: Francis A. Bottini, Jr
Represented By: Albert Y. Chang
Represented By: Mr. Aaron Paul Arnzen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: STEVE GARRETT
Represented By: Tyson C. Redenbarger
Represented By: Mr. Mark Cotton Molumphy
Represented By: Joseph W. Cotchett
Represented By: Gia Jung
Represented By: Francis A. Bottini, Jr
Represented By: Albert Y. Chang
Represented By: Mr. Aaron Paul Arnzen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: NANCY PRICE
Represented By: Mr. Aaron Paul Arnzen
Represented By: Albert Y. Chang
Represented By: Francis A. Bottini, Jr
Represented By: Gia Jung
Represented By: Tyson C. Redenbarger
Represented By: Mr. Mark Cotton Molumphy
Represented By: Joseph W. Cotchett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JOHN GARRETT
Represented By: Mr. Aaron Paul Arnzen
Represented By: Albert Y. Chang
Represented By: Francis A. Bottini, Jr
Represented By: Gia Jung
Represented By: Tyson C. Redenbarger
Represented By: Mr. Mark Cotton Molumphy
Represented By: Joseph W. Cotchett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: BRIAN BELGRAVE
Represented By: Mr. Aaron Paul Arnzen
Represented By: Albert Y. Chang
Represented By: Francis A. Bottini, Jr
Represented By: Gia Jung
Represented By: Tyson C. Redenbarger
Represented By: Mr. Mark Cotton Molumphy
Represented By: Joseph W. Cotchett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: TWITTER INVESTOR GROUP
Represented By: Gia Jung
Represented By: Joseph W. Cotchett
Represented By: Mr. Mark Cotton Molumphy
Represented By: Tyson C. Redenbarger
Represented By: Mr. Aaron Paul Arnzen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ELON MUSK
Represented By: Michael Lifrak
Represented By: Matthew Alexander Bergjans
Represented By: Mr. Stephen Broome
Represented By: Mr. Jesse Bernstein
Represented By: Mr. Alex Spiro
Represented By: Ms. Ellyde R. Thompson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?