United States of America v. Rhodes
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: RONALD CLAYTON RHODES and Big Fly
Case Number: 26-4937
Filed: August 3, 2026
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 4, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 4, 2026 Filing 7 ADDED Counsel for Appellee Kelly A. Zusman [Entered: 08/04/2026 04:27 PM]
August 4, 2026 Filing 6 ADDED Counsel for Appellee Sarah Barr [Entered: 08/04/2026 04:25 PM]
August 4, 2026 Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Kelly A. Zusman for Appellee United States of America. [Entered: 08/04/2026 04:15 PM]
August 4, 2026 Filing 4 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Sarah Barr for Appellee United States of America. [Entered: 08/04/2026 04:05 PM]
August 4, 2026 Filing 3 ADDED Counsel for Appellee Criminal Appeals USAO Oregon [Entered: 08/04/2026 08:51 AM]
August 3, 2026 Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Sentence Imposed: [Life sentence]. Appeal Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 11/23/2026, Appeal Transcript Due (Appellant) 9/14/2026, Appeal Transcript Order Due (Appellant) 8/14/2026, Appeal Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 10/23/2026. For appeal no. 26-4937, 3:22-cr-00137-MC-1. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule may result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1 [Entered: 08/03/2026 09:46 AM]
August 3, 2026 Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 3:22-cr-00137-MC-1 has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-4937 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 08/03/2026 09:42 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: United States of America v. Rhodes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: RONALD CLAYTON RHODES
Represented By: Jay A. Nelson
Represented By: Benjamin Kim
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Big Fly
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Mr. Parakram Singh, ASUSAT
Represented By: Lewis Burkhart
Represented By: Leah K. Bolstad
Represented By: Criminal Appeals USAO Oregon, Appellate Criminal Chief
Represented By: Ms. Kelly A. Zusman
Represented By: Sarah Barr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?