MGA Entertainment, Inc. v. Harris, et al.
| TAMEKA TINY HARRIS, an individual, erroneously sued as Grand Hustle, LLC and Pretty Hustle, LLC, MGA ENTERTAINMENT, INC., a California corporation, CLIFFORD T.I. HARRIS, OMG Girlz, LLC, OMG GIRLZ, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, GRAND HUSTLE, LLC, a Georgia limited liability company and PRETTY HUSTLE, LLC, a Georgia limited liability company |
| ISAAC LARIAN |
| 26-5071 |
| August 7, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Trademark |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 28, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 MEDIATION QUESTIONNAIRE filed by Appellant Clifford T.I. Harris, Appellant Tameka Tiny Harris, Appellant OMG Girlz, LLC, Appellant Grand Hustle, LLC, Appellant Pretty Hustle, LLC. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please email #[email protected] and include the case name and number in the subject line. Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts. [Entered: 09/28/2026 02:32 PM] |
| Filing 5 MEDIATION ORDER (text only): Mediation Questionnaire due (Appellant) 9/28/2026. The court of appeals' records do not indicate that appellant has filed a mediation questionnaire in accordance with Cir. R. 3-4. Appellant shall file a Mediation Questionnaire (#form07.pdf (uscourts.gov)) or dismiss the appeal voluntarily. Information about the mediation program may be found on the court's website: #www.ca9.uscourts.gov/mediation. [Entered: 09/23/2026 10:23 AM] |
Filing 4
ORDER FILED. Proceedings in this court other than mediation are stayed until the district court rules on the timely tolling motions filed on August 5, 2026 and August 19, 2026. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4); Leader Natl Ins. Co. v. Indus. Indem. Ins. Co., 19 F.3d 444, 445 (9th Cir. 1994). The clerk will send a copy of this order to the district court and the district judge. [25-3448, 26-4771, 26-5071] [Entered: 08/20/2026 11:18 AM]
|
| Filing 3 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Appellant MGA Entertainment, Inc., Appellant Isaac Larian. [26-4771, 25-3448, 26-5071] [Entered: 08/10/2026 06:32 PM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Briefing will be set by further court order. For appeal no. 26-5071, 2:20-cv-11548-JVS-CTS. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [26-5071, 26-4771] [Entered: 08/07/2026 03:28 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:20-cv-11548-JVS-CTS has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-5071 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 08/07/2026 11:58 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.