Google LLC, et al. v. Bonta
Plaintiff: GOOGLE LLC and YOUTUBE, LLC
Defendant: ROB BONTA, In his official capacity as Attorney General of California
Case Number: 26-5132
Filed: August 11, 2026
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 11, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 11, 2026 Filing 2 PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION SCHEDULE NOTICE. Preliminary Injunction Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 9/8/2026, Mediation Questionnaire due (Appellant) 8/17/2026, Preliminary Injunction Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 10/6/2026. For appeal no. 26-5132, 5:25-cv-09795-EJD.All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 08/11/2026 11:27 AM]
August 11, 2026 Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 5:25-cv-09795-EJD has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-5132 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 08/11/2026 11:24 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Google LLC, et al. v. Bonta
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: GOOGLE LLC
Represented By: Elizabeth Prelogar
Represented By: Michael Rome
Represented By: Mr. Jonathan Alan Patchen
Represented By: Benedict Yung Hur
Represented By: Mr. Raymond P. Tolentino
Represented By: Ephraim A. McDowell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: YOUTUBE, LLC
Represented By: Elizabeth Prelogar
Represented By: Michael Rome
Represented By: Mr. Jonathan Alan Patchen
Represented By: Benedict Yung Hur
Represented By: Mr. Raymond P. Tolentino
Represented By: Ephraim A. McDowell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ROB BONTA, In his official capacity as Attorney General of California
Represented By: Zelda Rose Vassar
Represented By: Mr. William Bellamy
Represented By: Mr. Todd Grabarsky
Represented By: Samuel E. Sokolsky
Represented By: Meghan Strong
Represented By: Lara Haddad
Represented By: Christopher Kissel
Represented By: Asha Albuquerque
Represented By: Mr. Shiwon Choe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?