Adams v. Lanum, et al.
| RYAN SCOTT ADAMS and Rooster |
| BRUCE LANUM, Medical Provider, ARNP, ADAM CLARNO, Medical Provider, Nurse Practitioner, WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and TONY DUNNINGTON, Lt, Department Hearings Officer |
| 26-516 |
| January 26, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 16, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 REPLY to Response to Court Order (DE 7) filed by Appellee Bruce Lanum, Appellee Adam Clarno. [Entered: 03/16/2026 02:21 PM] |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Appellant Ryan Scott Adams. [Entered: 03/09/2026 01:25 PM] |
| Filing 7 RESPONSE to Order - Order to Show Cause (OSC) (DE 5) filed by Appellant Ryan Scott Adams. [Entered: 03/09/2026 01:23 PM] |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel filed by Appellant Ryan Scott Adams. [Entered: 03/09/2026 01:19 PM] |
Filing 5
ORDER FILED. The district court entered judgment on June 20, 2025. On January 20, 2026, the district court received appellants civil appeals docketing statement, dated October 10, 2025, which was filed as a notice of appeal. The notice of appeal received on January 20, 2026 was therefore not filed or delivered to prison officials within 30 days after the district court entered judgment on June 20, 2025. See 28 U.S.C 2107(a); Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A). However, appellants notice of appeal states that he filed an earlier notice of appeal in July 2025. The July 2025 notice of appeal does not appear on the district courts docket. A pro se prisoners notice of appeal is deemed filed when deposited in the institutions internal mail system if appellant submits sufficient evidence. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1); Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 270 (1988). Within 21 days, appellant must file a declaration or notarized statement attesting to the date the notice of appeal was deposited and whether first-class postage was prepaid. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1); Douglas v. Noelle, 567 F.3d 1103 (9th Cir. 2009). If appellant does not do so, the court will dismiss this appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If appellant files a declaration or statement, appellees may file a response within 10 days. Briefing is stayed. The clerk will serve Form 33 Inmate Declaration of Timely Filing on appellant. [Entered: 02/10/2026 09:57 AM]
|
| Filing 4 CLERK ACTION: Opening Brief submitted at DE 3 by Appellant Ryan Scott Adams is filed. No paper copies are required. [Entered: 02/09/2026 03:39 PM] |
| Filing 3 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Ryan Scott Adams. [Entered: 02/09/2026 03:38 PM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 3/9/2026, Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 4/6/2026. For appeal no. 26-516, 3:24-cv-05034-KKE. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 01/26/2026 01:39 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 3:24-cv-05034-KKE has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-516 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 01/26/2026 01:35 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
