FTE Networks, Inc., et al. v. Beys, et al.
| FTE NETWORKS, INC., THOMAS COLEMAN, JOSEPH CUNNINGHAM and STEPHEN GOODWIN |
| MICHAEL BEYS, MARIA FERNANDEZ, RICHARD DE SILVA, ERNEST SCHEIDMANN and ANDREW SANCHEZ |
| 26-518 |
| January 26, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Contract Actions |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 23, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER FILED. The parties Joint Request for Stay (Dkt. No. 10 in Case No. 26-518, Dkt. No. 25 in Case No. 25-6928) is GRANTED. All pending deadlines are stayed pending further notice of the parties. The parties must file either a stipulation of dismissal or a joint status report within forty-five (45) days of this order. The oral argument scheduled for April 24, 2026 in San Francisco is VACATED. [25-6928, 26-518] [Entered: 03/23/2026 01:56 PM]
|
| Filing 10 STATUS REPORT filed by Appellant Michael Beys, Appellant Richard De Silva. [Entered: 03/10/2026 03:30 PM] |
| Filing 9 CLERK ACTION: Opening Brief submitted at DE 7 and Excerpts of Record at DE 8 by Appellant Michael Beys, Appellant Richard De Silva are filed. No paper copies are required. [Entered: 02/20/2026 11:41 AM] |
| Filing 8 EXCERPTS OF RECORD submitted for filing by Appellant Michael Beys, Appellant Richard De Silva.--[COURT UPDATE: Corrected PDF attached as of 2/20/2026, REPLACING original attachment] [Entered: 02/17/2026 06:02 PM] [Edited: 02/20/2026 11:28 AM] |
| Filing 7 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Michael Beys, Appellant Richard De Silva.--[COURT UPDATE: Corrected PDF attached as of 2/20/2026, REPLACING original attachment] [Entered: 02/17/2026 06:00 PM] [Edited: 02/20/2026 11:24 AM] |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT on Friday, April 24, 2026 - 09:00 A.M. - Courtroom 1 - Scheduled Location: San Francisco CA View the Oral Argument Calendar for your case #here. NOTE: Although your case is currently scheduled for oral argument, the panel may decide to submit the case on the briefs instead. See Fed. R. App. P. 34. Absent further order of the court, if the court does determine that oral argument is required in this case, you are expected to appear in person at the Courthouse. If an in person appearance would pose a hardship, you must file a motion for permission to appear remotely by video, using ACMS filing type Motion to Appear Remotely for Oral Argument. Such a motion must be filed within 7 days of this notice, absent exigent circumstances. Please note that if you do file a motion to appear remotely, the court strongly prefers video over telephone appearance. Therefore, if you wish to appear remotely by telephone you will need to justify that request in your motion and receive explicit permission to do so. Be sure to review the #GUIDELINES for important information about your hearing. If you are the specific attorney or self-represented party who will be arguing, use the ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF HEARING NOTICE filing type in ACMS no later than 28 days before the hearing date. No form or other attachment is required. If you will not be arguing, do not file an acknowledgment of hearing notice. [25-6928, 26-518] [Entered: 02/15/2026 12:18 PM] |
| Filing 5 RELEASED FROM MEDIATION (text only). This case is released from the Mediation Program. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. [Entered: 02/03/2026 11:21 AM] |
| Filing 4 MEDIATION QUESTIONNAIRE filed by Appellant Michael Beys, Appellant Richard De Silva. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please email #[email protected] and include the case name and number in the subject line. Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts. [Entered: 02/02/2026 03:59 PM] |
|
Filing 3
ORDER FILED. In addition to all other issues the parties wish to raise in their briefs, the parties must address whether this court has jurisdiction over this appeal. See E. Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Trump, 932 F.3d 742, 762 (9th Cir. 2018) (order) (Ordinarily, a TRO is not an appealable order.). Briefing is expedited. The opening brief is due February 17, 2026. The answering brief is due March 10, 2026. The optional reply brief is due 14 days after the answering brief is served. The clerk will place this case on the calendar for April 2026. See 9th Cir. Gen Ord. 3.3(f). No streamlined extensions of time to file a brief will be approved. See 9th Cir. R. 31-2.2(a)(1). [Entered: 01/30/2026 12:11 PM]
|
| Filing 2 PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION SCHEDULE NOTICE. Preliminary Injunction Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 3/23/2026, Preliminary Injunction Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 2/23/2026, Mediation Questionnaire due (Appellant) 2/2/2026. For appeal no. 26-518, 2:25-cv-01927-ART-EJY.All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 01/26/2026 01:46 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:25-cv-01927-ART-EJY has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-518 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 01/26/2026 01:40 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
